CVE-2026-34776
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedElectron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to versions 38.8.6, 39.8.1, 40.8.1, and 41.0.0, on macOS and Linux, apps that call app.requestSingleInstanceLock() were vulnerable to an out-of-bounds heap read when parsing a crafted second-instance message. Leaked memory could be delivered to the app's second-instance event handler. This issue is limited to processes running as the same user as the Electron app. Apps that do not call app.requestSingleInstanceLock() are not affected. Windows is not affected by this issue. This issue has been patched in versions 38.8.6, 39.8.1, 40.8.1, and 41.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Electron apps on macOS and Linux that use app.requestSingleInstanceLock(), a crafted second-instance message triggers an out-of-bounds heap read, allowing leaking arbitrary heap memory to the application's second-instance event handler. This only affects same-user processes and Windows is not impacted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 38.8.6>= 39.0.0, < 39.8.1>= 40.0.0, < 40.8.1= 41.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Electron versionRun 'npm list electron' or check the electron version in package.json, or run 'electron --version' from the application directoryAffected if version is less than 38.8.6, or between 39.0.0 and 39.8.1 (exclusive), or between 40.0.0 and 40.8.1 (exclusive), or exactly 41.0.0
-
Verify single instance lock is usedSearch the application source code for 'app.requestSingleInstanceLock()' callsAffected if the application calls app.requestSingleInstanceLock() to enforce single-instance behavior
-
Confirm operating systemCheck if the application is running on macOS or Linux (check via 'uname -a' or system info)Affected if running on macOS or Linux; the vulnerability does not affect Windows
Affected if: Electron version is in a vulnerable range AND the app uses app.requestSingleInstanceLock() AND runs on macOS or Linux.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped38.8.639.8.140.8.1
Update Electron to versions 38.8.6, 39.8.1, 40.8.1, or 41.0.0 to patch the vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, avoid using app.requestSingleInstanceLock() until upgrade is possible.
Upgrade to Electron 38.8.6, 39.8.1, 40.8.1, or 41.0.0 (41.0.0 recommended for latest features and fixes)
- Identify the current Electron version in use by checking package.json or node_modules/electron/package.json
- Determine the appropriate target version based on current version: if <38.8.6 upgrade to 38.8.6; if >=39.0.0 and <39.8.1 upgrade to 39.8.1; if >=40.0.0 and <40.8.1 upgrade to 40.8.1; if 41.0.0 upgrade to 41.0.0
- Update the Electron dependency in package.json to the appropriate fixed version (e.g., "electron": "^41.0.0")
- Run npm install or yarn install to download the updated Electron version
- Verify the installation by checking electron --version
- Test the application's second-instance lock functionality to ensure it works correctly
- If running on macOS or Linux, ensure app.requestSingleInstanceLock() behaves as expected after upgrade
- Rebuild and redistribute the application with the patched Electron version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34776 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34776 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data