CVE-2026-37526
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAGL app-framework-binder (afb-daemon) through v19.90.0 allows any local process to execute privileged supervision commands (Exit, Do, Sclose, Config, Trace, Debug, Token, slist) without authentication via the abstract Unix socket @urn:AGL:afs:supervision:socket. The on_supervision_call function in src/afb-supervision.c dispatches all 8 commands without any credential verification. The abstract socket has no DAC protection, as acknowledged in the official CAUTION comment in src/afs-supervision.h. This allows a low-privileged local process to kill the daemon (DoS via Exit command), execute arbitrary API calls (via Do command), close arbitrary user sessions (via Sclose command), or leak the entire global configuration (via Config command). The vulnerability was introduced in commit b8c9d5de384efcfa53ebdb3f0053d7b3723777e1 on 2017-06-29.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe AGL app-framework-binder (afb-daemon) through v19.90.0 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability where the on_supervision_call function in src/afb-supervision.c dispatches all 8 supervision commands (Exit, Do, Sclose, Config, Trace, Debug, Token, slist) without any credential verification over an unprotected abstract Unix socket @urn:AGL:afs:supervision:socket. This allows any low-privileged local process to kill the daemon, execute arbitrary API calls, close user sessions, or leak global configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 17.1.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if afb-daemon is installedCheck for the presence of the afb-daemon binary or app-framework-binder package using 'which afb-daemon' or 'dpkg -l | grep afb-daemon' or 'rpm -qa | grep afb'Affected if The package is installed and version is <= v19.90.0 or version cannot be determined but the daemon is present in AGL <= 17.1.12
-
Determine afb-daemon versionRun 'afb-daemon --version' or check the package version with your system package manager (dpkg/rpm)Affected if Version is v19.90.0 or earlier, or the --version flag is not available indicating an old build
-
Verify the supervision socket is exposedCheck for the abstract Unix socket using 'ss -x | grep urn:AGL:afs:supervision' or by examining /proc/net/unix for the socket nameAffected if The socket @urn:AGL:afs:supervision:socket exists and is listening (indicates the vulnerable service is active)
-
Check socket permissions and credential requirementsExamine the source code or configuration for on_supervision_call in src/afb-supervision.c to verify if credential verification is implemented, or test by attempting to connect to the socket from a low-privileged processAffected if No credential or permission check is performed before dispatching supervision commands (Exit, Do, Sclose, Config, Trace, Debug, Token, slist)
-
Confirm the system is Automotive Grade LinuxCheck the OS distribution using 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'cat /etc/agnt-version' on AGL systemsAffected if Running Linuxfoundation Automotive Grade Linux version <= 17.1.12
You are affected if running AGL <= 17.1.12 with afb-daemon present and the supervision socket @urn:AGL:afs:supervision:socket is exposed without credential checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement credential verification in the on_supervision_call function to authenticate clients before dispatching privileged commands, and add DAC protection to the abstract socket.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-37526 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-37526 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data