CVE-2026-37530
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAGL agl-service-can-low-level thru 17.1.12 contains a stack buffer overflow in the uds-c library. The send_diagnostic_request function in uds.c allocates a 6-byte stack buffer (MAX_DIAGNOSTIC_PAYLOAD_SIZE=6) but copies up to 7 bytes (MAX_UDS_REQUEST_PAYLOAD_LENGTH=7) via memcpy at an offset of 1+pid_length (2-3 bytes), resulting in 1-4 bytes of controlled stack overflow. The payload_length field (uint8_t) has no bounds check against the destination buffer. On 32-bit ARM automotive ECUs without stack canaries, this can lead to return address overwrite and RCE.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack buffer overflow in AGL agl-service-can-low-level thru 17.1.12 where send_diagnostic_request in uds.c uses a 6-byte stack buffer (MAX_DIAGNOSTIC_PAYLOAD_SIZE=6) but memcpy can copy up to 7 bytes (MAX_UDS_REQUEST_PAYLOAD_LENGTH=7) at an offset of 1+pid_length, allowing 1-4 bytes of controlled overflow. On 32-bit ARM automotive ECUs without stack canaries, this enables return address overwrite and potential RCE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 17.1.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if agl-service-can-low-level package is installedRun 'dpkg -l agl-service-can-low-level' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i agl-service-can-low-level' or check package management system for this specific packageAffected if Package is installed with version <= 17.1.12 (or if version cannot be determined but package exists on AGL <= 17.1.12 systems)
-
Locate the vulnerable uds.c source fileSearch for uds.c in the agl-service-can-low-level package files: 'find /usr -name uds.c 2>/dev/null' or 'dpkg -L agl-service-can-low-level | grep uds.c'Affected if The uds.c file exists and is from the affected package version
-
Verify the vulnerable memcpy pattern existsExamine uds.c and look for memcpy calls using MAX_DIAGNOSTIC_PAYLOAD_SIZE (6-byte buffer) copying from a source that can be up to MAX_UDS_REQUEST_PAYLOAD_LENGTH (7 bytes) at offset 1+pid_lengthAffected if The code contains the unbounded memcpy pattern: memcpy to a 6-byte buffer from a 7-byte max source at offset 1+pid_length
-
Confirm the diagnostic request feature is enabledCheck if the CAN low-level service is running or configured to start: 'systemctl status agl-service-can-low-level' or check service configuration files in /etc or /varAffected if The agl-service-can-low-level service is active or enabled, enabling the vulnerable code path
The system is affected if agl-service-can-low-level version <= 17.1.12 is installed AND the service is running, which exposes the stack buffer overflow in uds.c send_diagnostic_request function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAdd bounds checking to validate payload_length against MAX_DIAGNOSTIC_PAYLOAD_SIZE before memcpy, or increase the destination buffer to MAX_UDS_REQUEST_PAYLOAD_LENGTH. For automotive ECUs, ensure patch deployment accounts for the embedded system's update constraints.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,872.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-37530 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-37530 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data