CVE-2026-39304
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDenial of Service via Out of Memory vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Client, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. ActiveMQ NIO SSL transports do not correctly handle TLSv1.3 handshake KeyUpdates triggered by clients. This makes it possible for a client to rapidly trigger updates which causes the broker to exhaust all its memory in the SSL engine leading to DoS. Note: TLS versions before TLSv1.3 (such as TLSv1.2) are broken but are not vulnerable to OOM. Previous TLS versions require a full handshake renegotiation which causes a connection to hang but not OOM. This is fixed as well. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Client: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4; Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.4 or 5.19.5, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache ActiveMQ NIO SSL transports fail to properly handle TLSv1.3 handshake KeyUpdate messages from clients, allowing malicious clients to rapidly trigger KeyUpdates that exhaust the broker's memory in the SSL engine, causing an Out of Memory condition and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.19.4>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.4< 5.19.4>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache ActiveMQ versionCheck the version file in the ActiveMQ installation directory (e.g., bin/activemq --version, or check the pom.xml, or look at the release.properties file in the installation root).Affected if The installed version is less than 5.19.4 OR greater than or equal to 6.0.0 but less than 6.2.4.
-
Determine if NIO SSL transport connectors are configuredExamine the ActiveMQ configuration file (typically conf/activemq.xml) and look for <transportConnector> elements that use 'nio+ssl://' or 'ssl://' with NIO acceptor settings.Affected if The broker exposes an NIO SSL transport connector (nio+ssl://) or an SSL connector configured to use NIO.
-
Verify TLSv1.3 is enabled for SSL transportsCheck the transport connector URI for TLS protocol settings. Look for 'transport.enabledProtocols=TLSv1.3' in the connector URI or check the JVM ssl.enabledProtocols system property configuration.Affected if TLSv1.3 is explicitly enabled or is the default protocol for the SSL transport connector.
-
Check SSL engine configuration for memory limitsReview the broker startup scripts and configuration for any custom SSLEngine settings, particularly ssl.[context|engine].reuseaddr, or custom memory pool configurations.Affected if There are no SSL engine memory limits configured and no connection rate limiting in place.
The environment is affected if the ActiveMQ version falls within the vulnerable ranges (below 5.19.4 or between 6.0.0 and 6.2.4) AND the broker is configured with NIO SSL transport connectors using TLSv1.3.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.19.46.2.4
Upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ version 5.19.5 or 6.2.4 or later, which contain the fix for proper TLSv1.3 KeyUpdate handling.
Upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ 5.19.5 (for 5.x branch) or 6.2.4 (for 6.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current ActiveMQ version in use (client, broker, or combined installation)
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies: if currently on 5.x branch, upgrade to 5.19.5; if on 6.x branch, upgrade to 6.2.4
- 3. Stop the ActiveMQ service or gracefully disconnect all clients
- 4. Create a full backup of the current ActiveMQ installation directory and configuration files
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed release (5.19.5 or 6.2.4) from the official Apache ActiveMQ downloads page at activemq.apache.org
- 6. Install the new version by extracting the downloaded package to the target directory
- 7. Restore or migrate configuration files from the backup to the new installation
- 8. Verify file permissions are correctly set for the new installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39304 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39304 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data