CVE-2026-40244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenEXR provides the specification and reference implementation of the EXR file format, an image storage format for the motion picture industry. In versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.9, 3.3.0 through 3.3.9, and 3.2.0 through 3.2.7, `internal_dwa_compressor.h:1722` performs `curc->width * curc->height` in `int32` arithmetic without a `(size_t)` cast. This is the same overflow pattern fixed in other locations by the recent CVE-2026-34589 batch, but this line was missed. Versions 3.4.10, 3.3.10, and 3.2.8 contain a fix that addresses `internal_dwa_compressor.h:1722`.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in OpenEXR's DWA compressor where `curc->width * curc->height` is computed using 32-bit int arithmetic without a (size_t) cast at internal_dwa_compressor.h:1722. This can cause the multiplication result to overflow, potentially leading to heap corruption or denial of service when processing specially crafted EXR image files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.2.0, < 3.2.8>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.10>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine OpenEXR library versionRun `pkg-config --modversion OpenEXR` or check the library file with `dpkg -l | grep openexr` (Debian) or `rpm -q openexr` (RHEL). If built from source, check the version in the source directory or the installed headers.Affected if The installed version is 3.2.0 through 3.2.7, 3.3.0 through 3.3.9, or 3.4.0 through 3.4.9 (i.e., it falls within any of the affected ranges: >=3.2.0 <3.2.8, >=3.3.0 <3.3.10, or >=3.4.0 <3.4.10).
-
Identify if any EXR files use DWA compressionUse `exrinfo -c <file.exr>` or examine the compression method field in the EXR file header. DWA compression appears as DWAA (lossy) or DWAB (lossy with higher quality) in the compression attribute.Affected if EXR files processed by the OpenEXR library use DWAA or DWAB compression, as the vulnerability exists specifically in the DWA compressor code path.
-
Verify the vulnerable code path is reachableCheck if any application or tool loads and processes EXR files with DWA compression. This includes image viewers, editors, or custom tools using libOpenEXR to decode EXR images.Affected if Any application linked against the affected OpenEXR version is used to process DWA-compressed EXR files, triggering the integer overflow at internal_dwa_compressor.h:1722.
You are affected if your installed OpenEXR version is within any of the affected ranges AND you process EXR files using DWAA or DWAB compression, as the overflow occurs in the DWA compressor when computing width*height without a size_t cast.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.83.3.103.4.10
Upgrade OpenEXR to version 3.4.10, 3.3.10, or 3.2.8 which contain the fix for this integer overflow by adding the proper (size_t) cast.
OpenEXR 3.2.8 (or later 3.2.x), 3.3.10 (or later 3.3.x), or 3.4.10 (or later 3.4.x)
- Identify the current OpenEXR version in use (e.g., via package manager or binary inspection)
- Determine which version branch is in use (3.2.x, 3.3.x, or 3.4.x)
- Upgrade to the fixed version for that branch: 3.2.8 for 3.2.x, 3.3.10 for 3.3.x, or 3.4.10 for 3.4.x
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- Rebuild any dependent projects or applications that link against OpenEXR
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data