CVE-2026-40976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn certain circumstances, Spring Boot's default web security is ineffective allowing unauthorized access to all endpoints. For an application to be vulnerable, it must: be a servlet-based web application; have no Spring Security configuration of its own and rely on the default web security filter chain; depend on spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure; not depend on spring-boot-health. If any of the above does not apply, the application is not vulnerable. Affected: Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5; upgrade to 4.0.6 or later per vendor advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSpring Boot 4.0.0-4.0.5 has a security bypass where the default web security filter chain becomes ineffective under specific conditions: when the app is servlet-based, lacks custom Spring Security configuration, includes spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure, and excludes spring-boot-health. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access all endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Spring Boot versionInspect your pom.xml, build.gradle, or run 'mvn spring-boot:parent' to find the Spring Boot version. Look for the <parent><version> element in pom.xml or the 'springBootVersion' variable in build.gradle.Affected if Version is 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, or 4.0.5
-
Verify spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure dependencySearch your dependency management file (pom.xml or build.gradle) for 'spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure' in the dependencies section.Affected if The dependency is present in your build configuration
-
Confirm spring-boot-health is excludedSearch your pom.xml for <exclusions> containing 'spring-boot-health' or check build.gradle for an exclude statement for 'spring-boot-health'. Also verify the dependency is not listed in your dependencies section.Affected if spring-boot-health is explicitly excluded or not present as a dependency while actuator-autoconfigure is included
-
Check for custom Spring Security configurationLook for a @Configuration class annotated with @EnableWebSecurity or any WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter implementation in your source code. Also check for security-related properties in application.properties/yml under spring.security.*Affected if No custom Spring Security configuration exists - the application relies on Spring Boot's default security behavior
-
Confirm servlet-based application typeVerify your application uses javax.servlet.* or jakarta.servlet.* APIs. Check for @WebServlet annotations, servlet registrations in code, or a web.xml file. Spring Boot Web (Spring MVC) applications using the default auto-configuration are servlet-based.Affected if The application is servlet-based (standard Spring Boot web application, not reactive)
You are affected if your Spring Boot version is 4.0.0-4.0.5, you have spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure without spring-boot-health, use default security with no custom Spring Security config, and run a servlet-based application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.0.6
Upgrade Spring Boot to version 4.0.6 or later, or implement explicit Spring Security configuration to replace the default filter chain.
Spring Boot 4.0.6 or later
- Identify the current Spring Boot version in your project's pom.xml (for Maven) or build.gradle (for Gradle)
- Update the spring-boot.version property or plugin version to 4.0.6 or later
- Verify that spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure and spring-boot-starter-security dependencies are at compatible versions
- Rebuild the application with the updated dependencies
- Test that all endpoints remain accessible as expected and that security filtering functions correctly
- Deploy the rebuilt application to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data