Zebra RpcApplication · Zfnd

CVE-2026-41585

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.3.1 / 6.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. From zebrad versions 2.2.0 to before 4.3.1 and from zebra-rpc versions 1.0.0-beta.45 to before 6.0.2, a vulnerability in Zebra's JSON-RPC HTTP middleware allows an authenticated RPC client to cause a Zebra node to crash by disconnecting before the request body is fully received. The node treats the failure to read the HTTP request body as an unrecoverable error and aborts the process instead of returning an error response. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-rpc version 6.0.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A denial-of-service vulnerability in Zebra's JSON-RPC HTTP middleware allows an authenticated RPC client to crash the node by disconnecting before the request body is fully received. The node incorrectly treats the failure to read the HTTP request body as an unrecoverable error and aborts the process instead of gracefully handling the incomplete request and returning an error response.

MitigationUpgrade zebrad to version 4.3.1 or later and zebra-rpc to version 6.0.2 or later to receive the patch that properly handles incomplete request bodies as recoverable errors.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zebra RpcApplication
Affected:>= 2.0.0, < 6.0.2= 1.0.0
ZebradApplication
Affected:>= 2.2.0, < 4.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check zebrad version
    Run 'zebrad --version' or check the zebrad binary metadata
    Affected if Version is >= 2.2.0 and < 4.3.1
  2. Check zebra-rpc version
    Inspect the Cargo.lock file or dependency manifest for the zebra-rpc crate version, or check the zebrad build configuration
    Affected if Version is >= 2.0.0 and < 6.0.2, or version equals 1.0.0
  3. Verify JSON-RPC HTTP is enabled
    Inspect zebrad config file (default at ~/.zebrad.toml or /etc/zebrad.toml) for RPC HTTP listener configuration under [rpc] or [rpc.http] section
    Affected if An HTTP RPC listener is configured and active

A user is affected if they run a vulnerable zebrad (2.2.0 to < 4.3.1) or zebra-rpc (1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to < 6.0.2) with the JSON-RPC HTTP interface enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.3.1 / 6.0.2 or later
Fixed in 4.3.16.0.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade zebrad to version 4.3.1 or later and zebra-rpc to version 6.0.2 or later to receive the patch that properly handles incomplete request bodies as recoverable errors.

Recommended fix High confidence

zebrad version 4.3.1 or zebra-rpc version 6.0.2

  1. 1. Identify which Zebra component is affected in your deployment (zebrad node, zebra-rpc library, or both)
  2. 2. For zebrad: Update to version 4.3.1 or later using your package manager or by rebuilding from source with the updated version tag
  3. 3. For zebra-rpc: Update to version 6.0.2 or later by updating the dependency in your Cargo.toml file
  4. 4. After upgrading, verify the node starts successfully and test RPC functionality
  5. 5. Monitor the node to confirm it no longer crashes when clients disconnect prematurely

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zebra Rpc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,540
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41585 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41585 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data