CVE-2026-4206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. This affects the function FMT_rebuild_diskmgr/FMT_create_diskmgr/ScanDisk_run_e2fsck of the file /cgi-bin/dsk_mgr.cgi. Performing a manipulation results in command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple D-Link NAS devices contain a command injection vulnerability in /cgi-bin/dsk_mgr.cgi via the FMT_rebuild_diskmgr, FMT_create_diskmgr, and ScanDisk_run_e2fsck functions. Attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands through manipulation of these disk management functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the D-Link NAS device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label to confirm the exact model number. Affected models are: DNR-202L, DNR-326, DNS-1100-4, DNS-120, DNS-1200-05, DNS-1550-04, DNS-315L, DNS-320Affected if The device model matches one of the listed affected models
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to System > Firmware Upgrade or System Information page. Compare the firmware build date against 2026-02-05. Alternatively, check via CLI if SSH/telnet is enabled using 'cat /etc/version' or similar command that displays firmware infoAffected if The firmware build date is on or before 2026-02-05
-
Verify the vulnerable CGI endpoint is reachableAttempt to access https://[device-ip]/cgi-bin/dsk_mgr.cgi from within the local network. A successful HTTP 200 response indicates the endpoint exists and is accessibleAffected if The /cgi-bin/dsk_mgr.cgi endpoint responds to requests (indicating CGI is enabled)
-
Confirm disk management interface is accessibleLog into the device as an administrator and navigate to Storage > Disk Management or similar disk configuration section. Check if the functions FMT_rebuild_diskmgr, FMT_create_diskmgr, or ScanDisk_run_e2fsck can be accessed or triggeredAffected if Disk management features are enabled and accessible to authenticated users or via the CGI interface
-
Review access logs for suspicious disk management requestsCheck device logs (typically found in System > Logs or /var/log) for any unusual POST requests to /cgi-bin/dsk_mgr.cgi with unexpected parameters, especially those containing shell metacharacters like ; | & $ or backticksAffected if Logs show disk management CGI requests with potential command injection patterns
You are affected if your D-Link NAS model matches one of the eight listed models AND your firmware build date is on or before 2026-02-05, and the disk management CGI endpoint is accessible on your network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to affected devices, disable remote CGI access if possible, apply available firmware updates, and consider replacing end-of-life devices.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data