CVE-2026-4213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. This vulnerability affects the function cgi_myfavorite_del_user/cgi_myfavorite_verify of the file /cgi-bin/gui_mgr.cgi. Performing a manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the CGI binary gui_mgr.cgi on multiple D-Link NAS devices. The overflow occurs in the cgi_myfavorite_del_user and cgi_myfavorite_verify functions via unsanitized user input, allowing remote attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges through specially crafted HTTP requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05<= 2026-02-05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the D-Link NAS device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label to determine the exact model (e.g., DNR-202L, DNR-326, DNS-1100, DNS-320, etc.)Affected if The model matches any of the following: Dnr 202l, Dnr 326, Dns 1100 4, Dns 120, Dns 1200 05, Dns 1550 04, Dns 315l, or Dns 320
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface, navigate to the System or Settings section, and locate the firmware version information. Alternatively, check the firmware file name or the update history.Affected if The firmware version date is on or before 2026-02-05 (the firmware file date or version string indicates an older build)
-
Verify if the CGI web interface is enabled and accessibleAttempt to access the gui_mgr.cgi endpoint by browsing to http://[device-ip]/cgi/gui_mgr.cgi or similar path. Check if the device responds to CGI requests.Affected if The device web interface is accessible and the CGI binary responds to HTTP requests
-
Confirm network exposure of the management interfaceDetermine if the device HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 80/443) are accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, port forwarding configurations, or performing a port scan from an external location.Affected if The device management interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted LAN segments without proper access controls
-
Review web server access logs for suspicious requestsIf accessible, examine the device or upstream proxy logs for requests to /cgi/gui_mgr.cgi with unusually long parameters, especially those targeting functions like myfavorite_del_user or myfavorite_verify.Affected if Log entries show requests to gui_mgr.cgi with abnormally long parameter strings or patterns indicative of buffer overflow testing
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed D-Link NAS models with firmware dated 2026-02-05 or earlier, and the device CGI interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to affected devices, disable the vulnerable CGI endpoint if possible, or replace end-of-life devices as vendor firmware updates may not be available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data