CVE-2026-42127
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe public dashboard query endpoint does not limit request body size before processing, allowing unauthenticated attackers to trigger excessive memory allocation by sending arbitrarily large JSON payloads. This can lead to denial of service through memory exhaustion. No valid dashboard access token or authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe public dashboard query endpoint lacks request body size validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrarily large JSON payloads that cause excessive memory allocation and eventual denial of service through memory exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.6.14>= 12.2.0, <= 12.2.8>= 12.3.0, <= 12.3.6>= 12.4.0, <= 12.4.3>= 13.0.0, <= 13.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Grafana versionRun 'grafana-server -v' or check the version file (typically /usr/share/grafana/version or via the Grafana web UI at /api/health), or query the API endpoint /api/frontend/settings to retrieve the running versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: <= 11.6.14, >= 12.2.0 and <= 12.2.8, >= 12.3.0 and <= 12.3.6, >= 12.4.0 and <= 12.4.3, or >= 13.0.0 and <= 13.0.1
-
Confirm public dashboard feature is enabledCheck Grafana configuration file (grafana.ini) for 'public_dashboards.enabled = true' setting, or query the API endpoint GET /api/dashboards/uid/{uid} with 'publicDashboardAccessToken' to verify public access existsAffected if Public dashboards are enabled and accessible without authentication
-
Verify request body size limits are absentInspect the reverse proxy (nginx, Apache, traefik) configuration in front of Grafana for client_max_body_size or equivalent limits, and check grafana.ini for any [server] body_size_limit or similar settingsAffected if No body size limit is configured on the Grafana endpoint or reverse proxy, allowing unlimited request body sizes
-
Locate the dashboard query endpointReview Grafana API documentation or network traffic logs for requests to /api/public/dashboards/{dashboard_uid}/queries or similar public query endpointsAffected if The public dashboard query endpoint is accessible and accepts JSON payloads without size restrictions
You are affected if your Grafana version is one of the listed vulnerable versions AND public dashboards are enabled with no request body size limits configured on the query endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement request body size limits on the dashboard query endpoint (e.g., using middleware or framework-level size constraints) to reject oversized payloads before parsing, preventing memory exhaustion.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42127 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42127 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data