CVE-2026-42253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Web. The MessageServlet in the ActiveMQ web console API copies every JMS message property into an HTTP response header without any validation. This can allow overwriting and injecting security headers by setting them on JMS messages that are returned by the servlet. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6; Apache ActiveMQ Web: before 5.19.7, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.7 or 6.2.6, which fixes the issue. The MessageServlet has now been deprecated and disabled by default.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe MessageServlet in Apache ActiveMQ web console copies JMS message properties into HTTP response headers without validation, allowing attackers to inject or overwrite security headers via specially crafted JMS messages. This XSS vulnerability stems from improper input neutralization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.19.7>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.6< 5.19.7>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache ActiveMQ versionRun 'activemq --version' or check the version file in the ActiveMQ installation directory (e.g., 'lib/activemq-core-*.jar' or 'VERSION' file in the root directory)Affected if Version is less than 5.19.7, or greater than or equal to 6.0.0 but less than 6.2.6
-
Confirm Apache ActiveMQ Web console is enabledCheck the ActiveMQ configuration (typically 'conf/jetty.xml' or 'conf/jetty-realm.properties') for web console servlet mappings; look for 'MessageServlet' or 'webconsole' entriesAffected if Web console is enabled and accessible (by default on port 8161)
-
Verify MessageServlet is activeInspect the web.xml in 'webapps/admin/WEB-INF/web.xml' or check jetty.xml for servlet definitions; look for 'MessageServlet' or '/api/message/*' endpoint mappingsAffected if MessageServlet is explicitly enabled or mapped in the web console configuration
-
Test for MessageServlet endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the web console at /api/message/* endpoints (e.g., http://localhost:8161/api/message) using curl or a browser; note this requires the console to be runningAffected if The endpoint returns HTTP responses, indicating MessageServlet is actively handling requests
You are affected if your ActiveMQ version falls within the vulnerable range AND the MessageServlet in the web console is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.19.76.2.6
Upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ version 5.19.7 or 6.2.6 which fixes the vulnerability and disables the vulnerable MessageServlet by default.
5.19.7 or 6.2.6 (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify your current Apache ActiveMQ version by checking the installation directory or running the appropriate version command.
- 2. For ActiveMQ 5.x users: Upgrade to version 5.19.7 or later.
- 3. For ActiveMQ 6.x users: Upgrade to version 6.2.6 or later.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the MessageServlet is disabled by default (it was deprecated and disabled as part of this fix).
- 5. If you were relying on the MessageServlet functionality, test your integration after the upgrade as you may need to explicitly enable it if still required, though this is not recommended due to the security implications.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data