CVE-2026-42579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, Netty's DNS codec does not enforce RFC 1035 domain name constraints during either encoding or decoding. This creates a bidirectional attack surface: malicious DNS responses can exploit the decoder, and user-influenced hostnames can exploit the encoder. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNetty's DNS codec fails to enforce RFC 1035 domain name constraints during both encoding and decoding operations. This allows malformed domain names to be processed, creating a bidirectional attack surface where malicious DNS responses can exploit the decoder and user-influenced hostnames can exploit the encoder.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.133>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Netty version in useInspect your project's dependency management (pom.xml, build.gradle, package.json, or classpath). Search for io.netty:netty-all or specific Netty module dependencies and note the version number.Affected if The version is less than 4.1.133.Final or greater than or equal to 4.2.0 but less than 4.2.13.Final
-
Confirm netty-codec-dns module is presentSearch your dependencies for io.netty:netty-codec-dns. This module contains the vulnerable DNS codec classes.Affected if The netty-codec-dns dependency exists in your project
-
Check for DNS decoding usageSearch your codebase for imports and usage of DnsMessageDecoder, DnsDatagramPacket, or DnsResponse classes. These indicate your code processes DNS responses.Affected if Code uses DNS response parsing or decoding classes
-
Check for DNS encoding usageSearch your codebase for usage of DnsMessageEncoder, DnsRecordEncoder, or direct construction of DnsQuery/DnsResponse objects with hostnames. These indicate your code encodes domain names.Affected if Code encodes DNS messages or domain names into wire format
-
Inspect runtime classpathAt runtime, inspect the Netty version loaded by the classloader: locate netty-common-.jar in your classpath and check the filename for the exact version, or run: java -cp $(find . -name 'netty-common*.jar' | head -1) io.netty.internal.VersionInfo.version()Affected if The runtime Netty version matches the affected ranges in step 1
You are affected if your Netty version is within 4.2.0 to 4.2.12.Final or below 4.1.133.Final AND you use the netty-codec-dns module to encode or decode DNS messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.1334.2.13
Upgrade Netty to version 4.2.13.Final or 4.1.133.Final or later to enforce proper RFC 1035 domain name validation in the DNS codec.
4.1.133.Final (for 4.1.x line) or 4.2.13.Final (for 4.2.x line)
- Identify the current Netty version in use by examining Maven pom.xml or Gradle build.gradle dependencies
- If using Netty 4.1.x line (version < 4.1.133), upgrade to 4.1.133.Final
- If using Netty 4.2.x line (version >= 4.2.0 and < 4.2.13), upgrade to 4.2.13.Final
- Update the dependency version in the build configuration file
- Run build and tests to verify compatibility
- Redeploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data