CVE-2026-42913
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Remote Desktop Client due to improper synchronization when accessing shared resources. This concurrent execution flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code remotely over a network by exploiting the timing window in the synchronization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.7214< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.20348.5256< 10.0.26100.32995CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Remote Desktop Client is installedOpen Command Prompt and run: mstsc.exe /version or check for mstsc.exe in System32 folder (C:\Windows\System32\mstsc.exe)Affected if The client executable exists on the system
-
Determine Remote Desktop Client versionRight-click mstsc.exe in System32, select Properties, and view the File Version under the Details tab. Alternatively, run: powershell (Get-Item 'C:\Windows\System32\mstsc.exe').VersionInfoAffected if Version is less than 1.2.7214 (for standalone Remote Desktop Client installations)
-
Check Windows 11 versionRun: winver or go to Settings > System > About to view the Windows version and build numberAffected if Running Windows 11 23h2 with build < 10.0.22631.7219, 24h2 with build < 10.0.26100.8655, 25h2 with build < 10.0.26200.8655, or 26h1 with build < 10.0.28000.2269
-
Check Windows Server versionRun: winver or run 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt and look at the OS Version and Build NumberAffected if Running Windows Server 2022 with build < 10.0.20348.5256 or Windows Server 2025 with build < 10.0.26100.32995
The system is affected if the Remote Desktop Client version is below 1.2.7214, or if running a Windows version with a build number lower than the specified threshold for the respective version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.721410.0.20348.525610.0.22631.7219
Apply vendor-provided security patches for the Remote Desktop Client when released. Until a patch is available, restrict network exposure of RDP clients and monitor for anomalous client behavior.
Remote Desktop Client 1.2.7214 or later | Windows 11 23h2 build 10.0.22631.7219 or later | Windows 11 24h2 build 10.0.26100.8655 or later | Windows 11 25h2 build 10.0.26200.8655 or later | Windows 11 26h1 build 10.0.28000.2269 or later | Windows Server 2022 build 10.0.20348.5256 or later | Windows S
- Open Windows Update Settings (Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the installed build version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows edition
- For enterprise environments, deploy the relevant cumulative update via WSUS or Microsoft Update Catalog: Windows 11 23h2 (KB5048680), Windows 11 24h2 (KB5048702), Windows Server 2022 (KB5048685), or Windows Server 2025 (KB5048703)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42913 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42913 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data