CVE-2026-43185
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix signededness bug in smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() casts an unsigned __u32 value from sp->max_recv_size and req->preferred_send_size to a signed int before computing min_t(int, ...). A maliciously provided preferred_send_size of 0x80000000 will return as smaller than max_recv_size, and then be used to set the maximum allowed alowed receive size for the next message. By sending a second message with a large value (>1420 bytes) the attacker can then achieve a heap buffer overflow. This fix replaces min_t(int, ...) with min_t(u32)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a signedness bug in Linux kernel's ksmbd SMB server in function smb_direct_prepare_negotiation(). Unsigned __u32 values (sp->max_recv_size and req->preferred_send_size) are incorrectly cast to signed int before min_t() comparison. A malicious preferred_send_size of 0x80000000 wraps to negative as signed int (-2147483648), appearing smaller than max_recv_size and causing an undersized buffer allocation. Attacker sends a second message exceeding 1420 bytes to trigger heap buffer overflow.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.15, < 6.18.16>= 6.19, < 6.19.6= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ksmbd kernel module is loadedRun `lsmod | grep ksmbd` or check `/sys/module/ksmbd/version` if it existsAffected if The ksmbd module is loaded and running as a kernel module (not built-in to kernel)
-
Check kernel version against affected rangesRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the kernel version numberAffected if Kernel version is >= 5.15 and < 6.18.16, OR >= 6.19 and < 6.19.6, OR equals 7.0
-
Verify SMB server functionality is enabledCheck if ksmbd is actively serving via `systemctl status ksmbd` or `ps aux | grep ksmbd` or check SMB shares being servedAffected if The system is running ksmbd as an active SMB server daemon
-
Check if SMB direct/RDMA is configuredExamine ksmbd configuration files or running parameters for SMB direct (RDMA) support - look for 'smb_direct' or 'rdma' in config or module parametersAffected if SMB direct/RDMA is enabled, as this vulnerability requires the smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() function to be exercised during SMB negotiation
The system is affected if ksmbd is actively running as an SMB server AND the kernel version falls within the affected ranges, particularly when SMB direct (RDMA) support is enabled in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.166.19.6
Apply the upstream kernel patch replacing min_t(int, ...) with min_t(u32, ...) in smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() to preserve unsigned comparison semantics, then rebuild and deploy the fixed kernel.
Upgrade to Linux Kernel 6.18.16 or later, OR 6.19.6 or later (depending on which branch you are on)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- If running a distribution kernel (e.g., Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL), check if a distribution-provided kernel update is available that includes this fix. For enterprise distributions, this may be in a subsequent minor update.
- For custom-built kernels: Apply the patch from commit 55abc475d096da4a5356b6efb0cfdc6156bc1550 (https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55abc475d096da4a5356b6efb0cfdc6156bc1550). The fix changes `min_t(int, ...)` to `min_t(u32, ...)` in the smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() function in the ksmbd module.
- Rebuild the kernel with the fix applied
- Reboot into the fixed kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the smb_direct_prepare_negotiation() function source code for the corrected min_t(u32, ...) usage
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43185 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43185 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data