CVE-2026-43198
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: fix potential race in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() Code in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() after the call to tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() is done too late. After tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock(), the child socket is already visible from TCP ehash table and other cpus might use it. Since newinet->pinet6 is still pointing to the listener ipv6_pinfo bad things can happen as syzbot found. Move the problematic code in tcp_v6_mapped_child_init() and call this new helper from tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() before the ehash insertion. This allows the removal of one tcp_sync_mss(), since tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() will call it with the correct context.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() where after tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() returns, the child socket is already visible in the TCP ehash table and accessible by other CPUs, but newinet->pinet6 still incorrectly points to the listener's ipv6_pinfo instead of the child's, potentially causing memory corruption or use-after-free.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.12.1, < 6.18.16>= 6.19, < 6.19.6= 2.6.12= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within >= 2.6.12.1 and < 6.18.16, or >= 6.19 and < 6.19.6, or equals 2.6.12, or equals 7.0
-
Verify IPv6 kernel support is enabledCheck if the kernel has IPv6 support by running 'lsmod | grep ipv6' or checking /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6Affected if IPv6 support is loaded or the system has IPv6 interfaces configured (value shows 0)
-
Confirm the system accepts TCPv6 connectionsCheck for listening TCPv6 sockets with 'ss -tlnp | grep -i ":::"' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep -i "::"'Affected if The system has TCP sockets listening on IPv6 addresses (:: or ::1)
The system is affected if it runs a kernel version within the affected ranges AND has IPv6 enabled and accepts TCP IPv6 connections, as the race condition occurs in the child socket creation path for TCPv6 connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.166.19.6
Apply the upstream kernel patch which moves socket initialization code to tcp_v6_mapped_child_init() and calls it before ehash insertion to ensure proper socket context is established before the socket becomes visible to other CPUs.
Linux Kernel 6.18.16 or 6.19.6 (depending on your current branch)
- Verify current kernel version using `uname -r`
- Download or obtain the fixed kernel version: 6.18.16 or 6.19.6 (whichever is the latest stable in your kernel branch)
- Plan a maintenance window for the kernel upgrade
- Back up critical data and ensure system recovery options are available
- Install the new kernel package using your distribution's package manager (e.g., `apt-get install linux-image-<version>`, `yum install kernel-<version>`, or equivalent)
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- After reboot, verify the fix is applied by checking `uname -r` shows the fixed version and reviewing the kernel config matches your requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,536.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43198 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data