CVE-2026-43208
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: do not pass flow_id to set_rps_cpu() Blamed commit made the assumption that the RPS table for each receive queue would have the same size, and that it would not change. Compute flow_id in set_rps_cpu(), do not assume we can use the value computed by get_rps_cpu(). Otherwise we risk out-of-bound access and/or crashes.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the Linux kernel's RPS (Receive Packet Steering) mechanism allows out-of-bounds memory access. The bug occurs because set_rps_cpu() was reusing flow_id values computed by get_rps_cpu(), but the assumption that RPS tables for each receive queue have identical sizes that never change is incorrect. This can lead to out-of-bounds access and system crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.18, < 6.18.16>= 6.19, < 6.19.6= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the kernel versionAffected if The version falls within >= 6.18 and < 6.18.16, OR >= 6.19 and < 6.19.6, OR equals 7.0
-
Verify if RPS (Receive Packet Steering) is enabledCheck for RPS configuration files in /proc/sys/net/core/rps_cpus or look at network device queue configuration via 'ethtool -g <device>'Affected if RPS is enabled for any network interface (non-zero rps_cpus value or multiple receive queues with RPS configured)
-
Identify network devices with multiple receive queuesRun 'ethtool -l <device>' or check /sys/class/net/<device>/queues/ directory for multiple rx-queuesAffected if The system has network interfaces with multiple receive queues, which is required for RPS to be relevant
-
Confirm RPS flow table configuration existsExamine /proc/sys/net/core/rps_flow_cnt or check the presence of RPS flow tables in /sys/class/net/<device>/queues/Affected if RPS flow tables are allocated, which would be impacted by the out-of-bounds access when flow_id values exceed table boundaries
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version (6.18.x before 6.18.16, 6.19.x before 6.19.6, or 7.0) AND has RPS enabled on network interfaces with multiple receive queues, as the out-of-bounds memory access occurs when set_rps_cpu() reuses flow_id values from get_rps_cpu() against mismatched RPS table sizes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.166.19.6
Apply the kernel patch that computes flow_id directly in set_rps_cpu() rather than passing it from get_rps_cpu(), then deploy the updated kernel to affected systems. Given the critical CVSS 9.8 rating, prioritize patching.
Upgrade to Linux Kernel 6.18.16 (or later 6.18.x), 6.19.6 (or later 6.19.x), or a version newer than 7.0
- Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Download or obtain the fixed kernel package for your distribution
- For RHEL/CentOS/Fedora: use 'dnf update kernel' or 'yum update kernel'
- For Debian/Ubuntu: use 'apt-get update && apt-get install linux-image-<version>'
- Ensure the system has sufficient disk space for the new kernel (typically 100-200MB extra)
- Reboot the system to boot into the fixed kernel version using 'sudo reboot'
- Select the fixed kernel from the GRUB menu during boot
- Verify the new kernel is running with 'uname -r' and confirm the version is >= 6.18.16, >= 6.19.6, or > 7.0
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43208 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43208 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data