CVE-2026-44330
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedfree5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC's NEF mounts the nnef-pfdmanagement route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) to read PFD application data via GET /applications and GET /applications/{appID}, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via POST /subscriptions and DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, nnef-pfdmanagement IS declared in the runtime ServiceList, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true -- and it is not. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn free5GC versions prior to 4.2.2, the NEF's nnef-pfdmanagement route group is mounted without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization middleware. This allows unauthenticated network attackers who can reach the NEF's Service-Based Interface to use arbitrary bearer tokens to read PFD application data via GET endpoints and modify subscription records via POST/DELETE operations on the subscriptions endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify free5GC installation and versionRun 'free5gc-version' or check /opt/free5gc/version file, or inspect the free5gc container image tagAffected if Installed version is below 4.2.2
-
Locate the NEF service componentCheck running containers or processes for 'nef' service name, or inspect free5gc service configuration filesAffected if NEF component is present and running
-
Verify NEF service-based interface exposureCheck open ports on the NEF host (typically port 8080 or 8000 for SBI), or inspect Kubernetes/service mesh exposureAffected if NEF SBI port is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Test authorization bypass on nnef-pfdmanagement endpointsSend a request with a fake bearer token to GET /nausf-auth/v1/authorize or directly to NEF endpoints like GET /applications or POST /subscriptions using 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token'Affected if The request succeeds without returning 401/403 authentication errors
-
Review NEF middleware configurationInspect free5gc NEF configuration files (nefcfg.yaml) and source code for auth middleware on the nnef-pfdmanagement route groupAffected if The nnef-pfdmanagement route group lacks OAuth2 middleware binding
If free5GC version is below 4.2.2 and the NEF service-based interface is network-accessible, the environment is likely vulnerable to unauthorized PFD data access via the unprotected nnef-pfdmanagement endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.2
Upgrade free5GC to version 4.2.2 or later, which includes the fix for proper OAuth2/bearer-token authorization middleware on the nnef-pfdmanagement route group.
4.2.2
- Backup current free5GC configuration and data
- Stop the free5GC services
- Upgrade free5GC to version 4.2.2 or later by pulling the updated container images or source code from the free5GC repository
- Verify the nnef-pfdmanagement route group now includes inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization middleware
- Restart free5GC services
- Test that GET /applications, GET /applications/{appID}, POST /subscriptions, and DELETE /subscriptions/{subID} endpoints now properly validate bearer tokens against the OAuth2 authorization server
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44330 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data