CVE-2026-44774
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTraefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.46, 3.6.17, and 3.7.1, Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider allows a tenant with HTTPRoute creation permissions to expose the REST provider handler, bypassing the providers.rest.insecure=false setting. The Gateway provider accepts any TraefikService backend reference whose name ends with @internal, making it possible to route traffic to rest@internal in addition to the intended api@internal. In shared Gateway deployments where the REST provider is enabled, this allows a low-privileged actor to gain live dynamic configuration write access to Traefik, enabling unauthorized reconfiguration of routers and services. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.11.46, 3.6.17, and 3.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTraefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider allows tenants with HTTPRoute creation permissions to bypass the providers.rest.insecure=false setting by using TraefikService backend references ending with @internal (such as rest@internal), enabling unauthorized dynamic configuration write access to the REST provider.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.46>= 3.0.0, < 3.6.17>= 3.7.0, < 3.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Traefik versionRun 'traefik --version' or check the image tag/version in your Kubernetes deployment (e.g., kubectl get deployment traefik -o jsonpath="{.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image}")Affected if The version is less than 2.11.46, or between 3.0.0 and 3.6.16 inclusive, or between 3.7.0 and 3.7.0 inclusive
-
Verify REST provider is configuredCheck your Traefik static or dynamic configuration for 'providers.rest' settings. Look in your configuration files, Helm values (providers.rest), or environment variables (TRAEFIK_PROVIDERS_REST_*)Affected if The REST provider is explicitly configured in your Traefik configuration
-
Confirm insecure mode is disabledCheck if 'providers.rest.insecure' is set to 'false' in your Traefik configuration files, Helm values, or environment variablesAffected if providers.rest.insecure is explicitly set to false (the secure default)
-
Check if Kubernetes Gateway API provider is enabledVerify 'providers.kubernetesgateway' is enabled or if the Kubernetes Ingress or CRD providers are in use with Gateway API resources. Look for '--providers.kubernetesgateway' flag or TRAEFIK_PROVIDERS_KUBERNETESGATEWAY environment variableAffected if The Kubernetes Gateway API provider (kubernetesgateway) is enabled
-
Review HTTPRoute resources for suspicious backend referencesList all HTTPRoute resources in your cluster (kubectl get httproutes -A -o yaml) and examine any backendRefs that reference TraefikService with '@internal' suffix (e.g., myservice@internal)Affected if Any HTTPRoute resource contains a TraefikService backend reference ending with @internal pointing to rest or other internal services
You are affected if running a vulnerable Traefik version AND the REST provider is configured with insecure=false AND you have Gateway API resources that could contain TraefikService backend references with @internal suffix.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.463.6.173.7.1
Upgrade to Traefik 2.11.46, 3.6.17, or 3.7.1 or later. In shared Gateway deployments, restrict HTTPRoute creation permissions until patching is complete.
2.11.46 (for v2.x), 3.6.17 (for v3.0-3.6), or 3.7.1 (for v3.7)
- 1. Identify the current Traefik version by running `traefik version` or checking your deployment configuration
- 2. For Traefik v2.x users: If running a version < 2.11.46, upgrade to version 2.11.46
- 3. For Traefik v3.0.0-3.6.x users: If running version >= 3.0.0 and < 3.6.17, upgrade to version 3.6.17
- 4. For Traefik v3.7.0 users: If running version >= 3.7.0 and < 3.7.1, upgrade to version 3.7.1
- 5. Deploy the upgraded Traefik image or binary
- 6. Restart the Traefik service to apply the new version
- 7. Verify the fix by running `traefik version` and confirming the version number matches the target fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44774 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44774 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data