CVE-2026-53622
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTraefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 3.7.3, there is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Traefik versions prior to 3.7.3, HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS handshake performs an exact, case-sensitive SNI lookup to select the TLS configuration. This fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants, causing fallback to the default TLS configuration that may not require client certificates. However, the HTTP routing layer still dispatches requests to backends protected by router-specific mTLS policies, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass mTLS authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Traefik versionRun `traefik version` or inspect the deployed binary/container image tag. Compare the version number to 3.7.3.Affected if The installed version is below 3.7.3.
-
Identify HTTP/3 enabled entrypointsReview Traefik static configuration files (traefik.yml, traefik.toml, or --entrypoints flags) for `http3: true` entries under the entrypoints section.Affected if Any entrypoint has HTTP/3 enabled (http3: true).
-
Check for mTLS-configured routersReview dynamic configuration for routers that define TLS with `clientAuth` settings (such as `clientAuth.type: RequestClientCert` or `RequireAndVerifyClientCert`).Affected if One or more routers enforce mTLS via clientAuth configuration.
-
Identify default TLS configurationInspect Traefik configuration for a TLS options definition without a specific `snis` or `domains` matcher, which serves as the default TLS fallback.Affected if A default TLS configuration exists that does not require client certificates, while mTLS routers use specific SNI/domain matching.
You are affected if running Traefik below version 3.7.3 with HTTP/3 enabled on entrypoints serving routers that enforce mTLS, where a fallback default TLS configuration lacks client certificate requirements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.7.3
Upgrade Traefik to version 3.7.3 or later. Until upgraded, consider disabling HTTP/3 on entrypoints that enforce mTLS, or ensure UDP access to affected entrypoints is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Traefik 3.7.3
- Identify all Traefik deployments running versions prior to 3.7.3
- Review configuration to determine if HTTP/3 (QUIC) is enabled on any entrypoints
- Identify routers using wildcard Host rules (e.g., Host(`*.example.com`)) or case-insensitive hostname matching
- Identify routers with TLSOptions enforcing client certificate authentication (clientAuth: { type: RequestClientCert | RequireAnyClientCert })
- Plan maintenance window for upgrade
- Upgrade Traefik to version 3.7.3 or later
- Verify HTTP/3 functionality continues to work after upgrade
- Confirm mTLS enforcement is properly applied to all affected routers by testing with and without client certificates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53622 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53622 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data