CVE-2026-44930
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn LDAP injection vulnerability in the LDAP Certificate repository of the XKMS server in Apache CXF may allow an attacker to retrieve arbitrary certificates from the repository. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.1, 4.1.6 or 3.6.11, which fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn LDAP injection vulnerability exists in Apache CXF's XKMS server LDAP certificate repository. The vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate LDAP queries through unsanitized input, enabling retrieval of arbitrary certificates from the repository.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.6.11>= 4.0.0, < 4.1.6= 4.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache CXF versionCheck the CXF version in your project dependencies (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build file, or JAR manifest). Common locations: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF in cxf-core.jar, or the CXF version declared in your dependency management.Affected if The installed version is < 3.6.11, OR >= 4.0.0 and < 4.1.6, OR exactly 4.2.0
-
Determine if XKMS is deployedSearch for XKMS-related configuration files (xkms-server.xml, xkms-servlet.xml) or XKMS bean definitions in your application context files. Check for org.apache.cxf.xkms.* classes in your classpath.Affected if XKMS server components are deployed in your environment
-
Verify LDAP Certificate repository is configuredInspect your XKMS configuration for ldap: or LdapXKMSCertificateRepository bean definitions. Look for LDAP URL, base DN, and search filter configurations in xkms-server.xml or equivalent Spring/Blueprint XML.Affected if An LDAP-based certificate repository is configured for XKMS
-
Check LDAP query handlingReview the LDAP search filter patterns in your XKMS LDAP repository configuration. Look for user-controllable input being used directly in LDAP search filters without proper sanitization.Affected if LDAP search filters accept user input without parameterized query handling
You are affected if you run a vulnerable Apache CXF version (3.x before 3.6.11, 4.0.0-4.1.5, or 4.2.0) AND have XKMS with an LDAP Certificate repository actively configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.6.114.1.6
Upgrade Apache CXF to versions 4.2.1, 4.1.6, or 3.6.11 to obtain the fixed code that properly sanitizes LDAP query inputs.
Upgrade to CXF 3.6.11, 4.1.6, or 4.2.1 depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify the current Apache CXF version in use by checking pom.xml dependencies or build configuration
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version branch (3.x, 4.0.x-4.1.x, or 4.2.x)
- 3. For Maven projects: Update the CXF dependency version in pom.xml to 3.6.11 (for 3.x users), 4.1.6 (for 4.0.x-4.1.x users), or 4.2.1 (for 4.2.0 users)
- 4. For Gradle projects: Update the CXF dependency version in build.gradle to the appropriate fixed version
- 5. For direct JAR deployments: Replace the CXF JAR files with the new version from the Apache CXF download repository
- 6. Rebuild the application and run integration tests to verify the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- 7. Deploy the updated application to the target environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44930 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44930 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data