CVE-2026-49875
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache CXF's EndpointReferenceUtils and W3CMultiSchemaFactory classes construct a SAXParserFactory without the necessary JAXP hardening configurations, enabling out-of-band (OOB) external entity resolution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache CXF's EndpointReferenceUtils and W3CMultiSchemaFactory classes instantiate SAXParserFactory without applying JAXP security hardening configurations, leaving them vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) injection through out-of-band (OOB) external entity resolution. This allows attackers to exploit XML parsing to access local files, perform SSRF, or denial-of-service attacks via malicious XML documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.7>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache CXF installationSearch for CXF JAR files in your application's lib/classpath directories, or review your build configuration (pom.xml, build.gradle) for CXF dependenciesAffected if Apache CXF is present in the application and the version is < 4.1.7 or >= 4.2.0 but < 4.2.2
-
Determine CXF versionInspect the CXF JAR file name (e.g., cxf-core-4.x.x.jar) or check the version in your dependency management fileAffected if The installed version falls within < 4.1.7 or >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.2
-
Locate usage of vulnerable classesSearch your codebase for imports and usage of org.apache.cxf.endpoint.EndpointReferenceUtils and org.apache.cxf.wsdl11.WSDLManagerFactory$W3CMultiSchemaFactoryAffected if Code directly instantiates or calls these classes to process XML input
-
Identify XML parsing pathsReview code that uses the vulnerable classes to process XML from untrusted sources (REST/SOAP endpoints, file uploads, external APIs)Affected if The vulnerable CXF classes process XML originating from external or untrusted sources without additional validation
-
Verify JAXP security configurationInspect code that creates SAXParserFactory instances and check if it explicitly disables external entities via setFeature for http://xml.org/sax/features/external-general-entities and http://xml.org/sax/features/external-parameter-entities, or sets system properties javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory and/or access restrictions via ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD and ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMAAffected if SAXParserFactory instances used by CXF lack XXE protection features and accept default parser settings
You are affected if Apache CXF version is below 4.1.7 or between 4.2.0 and 4.2.2 (exclusive) AND your application uses EndpointReferenceUtils or W3CMultiSchemaFactory to parse untrusted XML without explicit XXE protection configured on the SAXParserFactory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.74.2.2
Upgrade Apache CXF to version 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 which contain the fix, or manually harden SAXParserFactory by disabling external DTDs and external entity resolution in existing deployments.
CXF 4.1.7 (for 4.1.x line) or CXF 4.2.2 (for 4.2.x line)
- 1. Identify the current Apache CXF version in use by checking project dependencies (e.g., pom.xml for Maven, build.gradle for Gradle, or JAR manifest files)
- 2. If using a 4.1.x version: upgrade to CXF 4.1.7 by updating the dependency version
- 3. If using a 4.2.0 or 4.2.1 version: upgrade to CXF 4.2.2 by updating the dependency version
- 4. For Maven projects, update the version in pom.xml: <artifactId>cxf-core</artifactId><version>4.1.7</version> or <version>4.2.2</version>
- 5. Rebuild and redeploy the application
- 6. Verify the fix by confirming the CXF version loaded matches the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,640.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49875 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49875 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data