CVE-2026-45673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, Netty's DNS resolver uses a predictable PRNG for generating DNS transaction IDs and defaults to a static UDP source port. This combination reduces the entropy of DNS queries, enabling DNS Cache Poisoning (Kaminsky attack). Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNetty's DNS resolver prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final uses a predictable pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) for DNS transaction IDs combined with a static UDP source port, which significantly reduces entropy and enables DNS Cache Poisoning (Kaminsky attack).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.135>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Netty DNS resolver in useSearch your codebase for imports of Netty DNS resolver classes such as io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsNameResolver or io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsResolver, or check your dependency manifest (pom.xml, build.gradle, requirements.txt, JAR files) for netty dependencies that include resolver-dnsAffected if Netty's DNS resolver classes are present in the application dependencies or code
-
Determine installed Netty versionLocate the netty-common or resolver-dns JAR file in your classpath, or check your dependency lock file (pom.xml, package-lock.json, gradle.lock) for the exact netty version numberAffected if The Netty version is below 4.1.135.Final or is 4.2.0 through 4.2.14.Final
-
Verify DNS queries are processed through NettyReview application code for creation of DnsNameResolver or DnsResolver instances, and check runtime logs or configuration for DNS query behavior using Netty's resolverAffected if The application creates and uses a Netty DnsNameResolver or DnsResolver instance to perform DNS lookups
-
Confirm UDP source port behaviorCapture network traffic during DNS resolution using tcpdump or Wireshark, filter for UDP packets from your Netty application to port 53, and observe whether the source port is static or changes between queriesAffected if The UDP source port remains identical across multiple DNS queries from the same process
You are affected if your application uses Netty's DNS resolver with a version prior to 4.1.135.Final or between 4.2.0 and 4.2.14.Final, and performs DNS lookups using the vulnerable resolver implementation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.1354.2.15
Upgrade Netty to version 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final which implements cryptographically secure random generation for DNS transaction IDs and randomized UDP source ports.
4.1.135.Final (for 4.1.x branch) or 4.2.15.Final (for 4.2.x branch)
- Identify the current Netty version in use by checking project dependencies (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle, or equivalent)
- Determine which Netty branch is being used (4.1.x or 4.2.x)
- For Netty 4.1.x users: upgrade to version 4.1.135.Final
- For Netty 4.2.x users: upgrade to version 4.2.15.Final
- Update the dependency version in the build configuration file
- Rebuild and test the application to ensure compatibility
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data