CVE-2026-46039
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxgk: Fix potential integer overflow in length check Fix potential integer overflow in rxgk_extract_token() when checking the length of the ticket. Rather than rounding up the value to be tested (which might overflow), round down the size of the available data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in rxgk_extract_token() in the Linux kernel's RxGK (Rx Gateway Key) implementation. The function incorrectly rounds up the length value during ticket validation checks, which can overflow and cause the length check to pass when it should fail. This allows potentially malicious or malformed tickets to bypass validation, leading to possible memory corruption or privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.16.9, < 6.17>= 6.17.1, < 6.18.27>= 6.19, < 7.0.4= 6.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to obtain the currently running kernel version, then compare it against the affected ranges: >= 6.16.9, < 6.17; = 6.17; >= 6.17.1, < 6.18.27; >= 6.19, < 7.0.4Affected if The installed kernel version falls within any of the listed affected version ranges
-
Verify rxgk module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep rxgk' to check if the rxgk kernel module is currently loaded in memoryAffected if The rxgk module is loaded and actively in use
-
Check for rxgk module availabilityRun 'modinfo rxgk' or check for the presence of /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/rxgk.ko (or .xz) to determine if the rxgk module exists on the systemAffected if The rxgk module is present on the system and could be loaded
-
Inspect kernel config for rxgk supportCheck /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz for CONFIG_RXGK=y or CONFIG_RXGK=m to see if rxgk support is compiled into the kernel or as a loadable moduleAffected if CONFIG_RXGK is set to y (built-in) or m (module) in the kernel configuration
-
Identify services using rxgk protocolReview running services and configurations for any daemon or application that utilizes the rxgk protocol (such as OpenAFS if used over rxgk), as the vulnerability is triggerable when processing rxgk ticketsAffected if Any network service or application using the rxgk protocol is running and accessible
A system is affected if it runs a Linux kernel version within the specified ranges AND has the rxgk module compiled, available, or loaded, and processes rxgk protocol traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.176.18.277.0.4
Apply the kernel patch that modifies rxgk_extract_token() to round down the size of available data instead of rounding up the test value, preventing the integer overflow. Update to a kernel version containing this fix.
Upgrade to kernel version 6.18.27, 7.0.4, or later stable release (e.g., 6.18.x or 7.0.x series)
- Identify your current kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Check if your version is in the affected range: >= 6.16.9 and < 6.17, = 6.17, >= 6.17.1 and < 6.18.27, >= 6.19 and < 7.0.4
- If affected, update your distribution's kernel package to a fixed version (see upgrade_path)
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- Verify the new kernel version is loaded using 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46039 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46039 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data