CVE-2026-46137
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: pm: ADD_ADDR rtx: fix potential data-race This mptcp_pm_add_timer() helper is executed as a timer callback in softirq context. To avoid any data races, the socket lock needs to be held with bh_lock_sock(). If the socket is in use, retry again soon after, similar to what is done with the keepalive timer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA data race vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's MPTCP (MultiPath TCP) path manager where the mptcp_pm_add_timer() callback runs in softirq context without properly holding the socket lock via bh_lock_sock(). This can lead to race conditions when the ADD_ADDR retransmission timer fires while the socket is in active use.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.10, < 5.10.259>= 5.11, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.141>= 6.7, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.30>= 6.19, < 7.0.7= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel version against affected rangesRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the running kernel version. Compare it to the affected ranges: >= 5.10, < 5.10.259; >= 5.11, < 5.15.210; >= 5.16, < 6.1.176; >= 6.2, < 6.6.141; >= 6.7, < 6.12.91; >= 6.13, < 6.18.30; >= 6.19, < 7.0.7; = 7.1Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges and MPTCP is in use
-
Verify MPTCP kernel support is loaded or compiled inCheck if the mptcp kernel module is loaded with `lsmod | grep mptcp` or check kernel config via `cat /boot/config-$(uname -r) | grep -i mptcp`Affected if MPTCP support exists in the kernel (module loaded or compiled in)
-
Detect active MPTCP sockets on the systemQuery for MPTCP connections using `ss -m | grep mptcp` or `cat /proc/net/mptcp` to see if any MPTCP sockets are establishedAffected if Active MPTCP connections or sockets exist on the system
-
Check for ADD_ADDR retransmission timer usageInspect MPTCP path manager configuration via `cat /proc/sys/net/mptcp/` or monitor for mptcp_pm_add_timer activity in kernel tracing if availableAffected if MPTCP path manager ADD_ADDR functionality is enabled and in use
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version within the listed ranges AND has MPTCP enabled with active connections using the path manager ADD_ADDR feature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2595.15.2106.1.176
Apply the kernel patch that ensures bh_lock_sock() is held in the timer callback to serialize access, or update to a kernel version containing the fix. Given the CVSS 9.8 critical rating, prioritize patching systems running MPTCP.
6.6.141 (or latest stable 6.6.x release)
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.10.259 or later for the 5.10.x branch
- OR upgrade to version 5.15.210 or later for the 5.11-5.15.x branch
- OR upgrade to version 6.1.176 or later for the 5.16-6.1.x branch
- OR upgrade to version 6.6.141 or later for the 6.2-6.6.x branch
- After kernel upgrade, reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Alternatively, apply the upstream stable patch commit 013dcdc1961543b9a3433466bc8c79a2f4ca75b5 to the affected kernel source and rebuild
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46137 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46137 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data