CVE-2026-46265
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix WQ_MEM_RECLAIM warning When sunrpc is used, if a reset triggered, our wq may lead the following trace: workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM xprtiod:xprt_rdma_connect_worker [rpcrdma] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hns_roce_irq_workq:flush_work_handle [hns_roce_hw_v2] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8250 at kernel/workqueue.c:2644 check_flush_dependency+0xe0/0x144 Call trace: check_flush_dependency+0xe0/0x144 start_flush_work.constprop.0+0x1d0/0x2f0 __flush_work.isra.0+0x40/0xb0 flush_work+0x14/0x30 hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp+0xac/0x1e0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] ib_destroy_qp_user+0x9c/0x2b4 rdma_destroy_qp+0x34/0xb0 rpcrdma_ep_destroy+0x28/0xcc [rpcrdma] rpcrdma_ep_put+0x74/0xb4 [rpcrdma] rpcrdma_xprt_disconnect+0x1d8/0x260 [rpcrdma] xprt_rdma_connect_worker+0xc0/0x120 [rpcrdma] process_one_work+0x1cc/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x154/0x414 kthread+0x104/0x144 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Since QP destruction frees memory, this wq should have the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.7, < 6.1.165>= 6.2, < 6.6.128>= 6.7, < 6.12.75>= 6.13, < 6.18.14>= 6.19, < 6.19.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.1656.6.1286.12.75
6.1.165 (for 6.1.x) / 6.6.128 (for 6.2-6.5.x) / 6.12.75 (for 6.7-6.11.x) / 6.18.14 (for 6.13-6.17.x)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which version branch your kernel is on (e.g., 6.1.x, 6.2.x, 6.6.x, 6.7.x, 6.12.x, or 6.13+)
- Upgrade the kernel to the first fixed version for your branch: For 6.1.x kernels, upgrade to 6.1.165 or later; For 6.2.x through 6.5.x kernels, upgrade to 6.6.128 or later; For 6.7.x through 6.11.x kernels, upgrade to 6.12.75 or later; For 6.13.x through 6.17.x kernels, upgrade to 6.18.14 or later
- Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version and confirming the workqueue warning no longer appears in dmesg during RDMA operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46265 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46265 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data