CVE-2026-47244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, DefaultHttp2Connection.DefaultEndpoint initialises maxActiveStreams/maxStreams to Integer.MAX_VALUE, and Http2Settings never inserts SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS by default (Http2Settings.java:305-307 only clamps a user-supplied value). Unless the application explicitly calls initialSettings().maxConcurrentStreams(n), a Netty HTTP/2 server advertises no limit and enforces none locally. Each open stream allocates a DefaultStream object, PropertyMap slots, flow-controller state and IntObjectHashMap entry; with ~2^30 permissible odd stream IDs a single TCP connection can create hundreds of thousands of long-lived stream objects. This is also the precondition for CVE-2023-44487-style Rapid-Reset amplification, where the absence of a low concurrent cap multiplies backend work. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNetty's HTTP/2 implementation fails to set a default limit on concurrent streams. The DefaultHttp2Connection.DefaultEndpoint initializes maxActiveStreams/maxStreams to Integer.MAX_VALUE, and Http2Settings doesn't insert SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS by default. This allows an attacker to open hundreds of thousands of streams on a single TCP connection, causing resource exhaustion and enabling Rapid-Reset style amplification attacks (CVE-2023-44487).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.135>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Netty versionInspect the netty-common or netty-transport JAR file manifest, or review Maven/Gradle dependency declarations for the netty versionAffected if Version is below 4.1.135, or 4.2.0 and above but below 4.2.15
-
Confirm HTTP/2 is enabledSearch the codebase for Http2FrameCodec, Http2MultiplexHandler, or HTTP/2 server/bootstrap configuration patternsAffected if HTTP/2 is actively configured and in use
-
Verify explicit stream limit configurationSearch for calls to initialSettings().maxConcurrentStreams(n) or equivalent configuration that sets SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMSAffected if No explicit maxConcurrentStreams limit is configured, allowing the default unbounded value (Integer.MAX_VALUE) to be used
-
Inspect Http2Settings initializationExamine how Http2Settings is constructed in the application; verify SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS is present in the settings objectAffected if Http2Settings uses defaults without SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS explicitly set
You are affected if your Netty version falls in the vulnerable range AND HTTP/2 is enabled without an explicit maxConcurrentStreams limit configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.1354.2.15
Upgrade Netty to versions 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final, which contain the patch. Alternatively, explicitly call initialSettings().maxConcurrentStreams(n) to enforce a stream limit.
4.1.135.Final (for 4.1.x line) or 4.2.15.Final (for 4.2.x line)
- Identify your current Netty version by checking your Maven pom.xml or Gradle build.gradle dependencies
- For Netty 4.1.x users: Update the Netty dependency version to 4.1.135.Final
- For Netty 4.2.x users: Update the Netty dependency version to 4.2.15.Final
- If using Maven, update the version in pom.xml: change netty version to 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final
- If using Gradle, update the version in build.gradle: change io.netty:netty-all to 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final
- Rebuild and test the application to ensure compatibility
- Deploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data