CVE-2026-47335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUbuntu Linux 6.8 contains SAUCE patches with a possible NULL pointer dereference in the handling of AppArmor notifications. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. This can lead to a kernel panic.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUbuntu Linux 6.8 kernel contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the AppArmor notification handling code. An unprivileged local user can trigger this bug, causing a kernel panic (denial of service). This is a local privilege escalation/DoS issue in the kernel's AppArmor security module.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the running kernel versionRun `uname -r` to display the currently running kernel release versionAffected if The version shown is exactly 6.8
-
Verify Ubuntu version matching CVE scopeRun `cat /etc/lsb-release` and check the DISTRIB_RELEASE field, or check `hostnamectl` for OS detailsAffected if The system runs Ubuntu Linux version 6.8
-
Confirm AppArmor is active on the systemRun `aa-status` or `cat /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/profiles` to see if AppArmor profiles are loadedAffected if AppArmor is enabled and loaded (the vulnerability exists in the AppArmor notification code, so it requires AppArmor to be active)
-
Check AppArmor module loaded stateRun `lsmod | grep apparmor` to verify the AppArmor kernel module is currently loadedAffected if The apparmor module is loaded into the kernel
A system is affected if it runs Ubuntu Linux kernel version 6.8 with AppArmor enabled and loaded, as the NULL pointer dereference occurs in the AppArmor notification handling code when triggered by a local user.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the available Ubuntu kernel security patch for CVE-2026-47335. Test thoroughly in a staging environment before production deployment, as kernel updates carry regression risks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,944.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data