CVE-2026-47676
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.21, app.mount() strips the mount prefix from the incoming request path using the raw URL pathname, while route matching is performed against the percent-decoded path. This inconsistency causes the prefix to be stripped at the wrong position when the path contains percent-encoded multi-byte characters, resulting in the mounted sub-application receiving an incorrect path. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.21.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Hono prior to 4.12.21, the app.mount() function strips the mount prefix from incoming request paths using the raw URL pathname, while route matching is performed against the percent-decoded path. When a path contains percent-encoded multi-byte characters (e.g., UTF-8 characters), this inconsistency causes the prefix to be stripped at the wrong position, resulting in the mounted sub-application receiving an incorrect or malformed path.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.12.21CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your Hono versionRun `npm list hono` or check your package.json dependencies to identify the installed version of the Hono framework.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.12.21 (the fixed version). Compare your version against the affected range of < 4.12.21.
-
Identify app.mount() usageSearch your codebase for occurrences of `app.mount(` or `.mount(` to determine if your application uses the mount functionality.Affected if Your code contains app.mount() calls that mount sub-applications to specific path prefixes.
-
Examine mount path parametersReview the path arguments passed to app.mount() calls. Look for static mount paths or dynamic paths that could receive user-supplied values.Affected if Mount paths include or could receive percent-encoded characters, particularly multi-byte UTF-8 characters (e.g., non-ASCII characters, international text).
-
Inspect request path handlingIf possible, add logging in your mounted sub-application to inspect the incoming request path it receives. Compare the received path against what was originally requested.Affected if The mounted sub-application receives a path that differs from the expected path after the mount prefix is stripped, indicating incorrect path normalization.
You are affected if you are running Hono version lower than 4.12.21 AND using app.mount() with paths that contain or could contain percent-encoded multi-byte characters, resulting in the mounted sub-application receiving malformed paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.12.21
Upgrade Hono to version 4.12.21 or later. Applications using app.mount() with paths that may contain percent-encoded characters should test that mounted sub-applications receive the correct path after the upgrade.
4.12.21
- Check your current Hono version by running `npm list hono` or looking at your package.json
- Update Hono to version 4.12.21 or later by running `npm install hono@^4.12.21` or `npm update hono`
- Verify the installation was successful by running `npm list hono` and confirming the version is 4.12.21 or higher
- Test your application's mounted routes, particularly those with percent-encoded characters in paths, to confirm the fix works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47676 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47676 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data