ColdfusionApplication · Adobe

CVE-2026-48325

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
98/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ColdFusion is affected by a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

In the news

Third-party coverage
Trending covered by 2 outlets this week · latest 1mo ago

Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

ColdFusion contains a missing authentication vulnerability for a critical function that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user without any user interaction. The changed scope indicates the vulnerability impacts components beyond the vulnerable component itself.

MitigationApply vendor-provided ColdFusion security patches immediately, restrict network exposure of ColdFusion administration endpoints, and verify the patch does not introduce regressions in critical application workflows.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ColdfusionApplication
Affected:= 2023= 2025

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ColdFusion installation and version
    Check the ColdFusion installation directory for version file, or query the Administrator login page which typically displays the version. Common paths: C:\ColdFusion2023\ or /opt/ColdFusion2023/ or check the cfusion context for versioninfo.cfm
    Affected if Installed version is exactly 2023 or 2025 (any update level)
  2. Verify ColdFusion Administrator is network-accessible
    Attempt to access the ColdFusion Administrator URL from an external host: http(s)://<hostname>/CFIDE/administrator/ or /cf2023/administrator/ depending on installation context
    Affected if The Administrator interface responds to requests from untrusted network locations (not localhost/127.0.0.1)
  3. Check Administrator authentication enforcement
    Review the server.xml or WEB-INF/cfusion/etc/neo-security.xml file to verify the admin.servers.enabled or authentication enforcement settings. Attempt an unauthenticated request to the Administrator endpoint
    Affected if The Administrator accepts requests without requiring valid credentials or session tokens
  4. Confirm network exposure of admin ports
    Review firewall rules and web server configuration to determine if port 8500 (default ColdFusion) or the configured admin port is open to untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if ColdFusion admin ports are accessible from untrusted network segments or the public internet

A system is affected if it runs Adobe ColdFusion 2023 or 2025 and has its Administrator interface accessible from untrusted networks without enforced authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided ColdFusion security patches immediately, restrict network exposure of ColdFusion administration endpoints, and verify the patch does not introduce regressions in critical application workflows.

Fix this in Coldfusion Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48325 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48325 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data