CVE-2026-48363
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier are affected by an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier contain an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability where the application loads resources from an attacker-controlled location. By placing a malicious file in a directory the application searches, an attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user when the victim opens the malicious file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2023= 2025CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ColdFusion versionCheck the ColdFusion version through the Administrator interface (Help > About Adobe ColdFusion) or by reviewing installation logs and registry entries for the ColdFusion installation pathAffected if The installed version is ColdFusion 2025.9 or earlier, or ColdFusion 2023.20 or earlier (including all earlier 2023 and 2025 releases)
-
Review ColdFusion search paths for librariesExamine the system PATH environment variable and any custom library paths configured in the ColdFusion Administrator under Server Settings > Java/JVM or in the jvm.config fileAffected if The search path includes directories writable by untrusted users or network locations accessible to attackers
-
Inspect directory permissions on ColdFusion search pathsFor each directory in the ColdFusion search path (especially bin, lib, and custom paths), check file system permissions using OS-native commands (icacls on Windows, ls -la on Linux) to determine if non-privileged users can write filesAffected if Any directory in the ColdFusion search path allows write access to untrusted users, enabling placement of malicious files
-
Scan for unexpected files in ColdFusion search directoriesList all files in the identified search path directories (particularly bin and lib folders within the ColdFusion installation) and compare against expected baseline filesAffected if Unexpected DLL, JAR, or resource files exist in ColdFusion search directories that were not part of the original installation
You are affected if running ColdFusion 2023 versions 2023.20 or earlier, or ColdFusion 2025 versions 2025.9 or earlier, AND your search path directories are writable by untrusted users or contain unexpected files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade ColdFusion to the vendor-patched version. Until then, restrict file system permissions and avoid opening untrusted files in the ColdFusion environment.
ColdFusion 2023 Update 21+ or ColdFusion 2025 Update 10+ (depending on your baseline version)
- 1. Identify your current ColdFusion version by checking the ColdFusion Administrator console or the version info in the installation directory.
- 2. Navigate to the Adobe ColdFusion security bulletins page (helpx.adobe.com) to obtain the latest security updates.
- 3. Download and install ColdFusion 2023 Update 21 or later for the 2023 version.
- 4. Download and install ColdFusion 2025 Update 10 or later for the 2025 version.
- 5. After applying the update, restart the ColdFusion application server service.
- 6. Verify the installation was successful by checking the ColdFusion Administrator > System Information page shows the updated version number.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48363 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48363 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data