Qiskit Software Development KitApplication · Ibm

CVE-2026-4870

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.4.6 / 2.4.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Qiskit SDK 0.43.0 through 2.5.0 could allow an attacker to trigger a segmentation fault leading to a denial of service due to uncontrolled recursion in the parser.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Qiskit SDK versions 0.43.0 through 2.5.0 contains an uncontrolled recursion vulnerability in its parser. By supplying specially crafted input to the parser, an attacker can cause excessive recursive calls that lead to a segmentation fault, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of IBM Qiskit SDK beyond 2.5.0 once available, or implement input validation/recursion limits in the parser to prevent stack overflow.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Qiskit Software Development KitApplication
Affected:>= 0.43.0, < 1.4.6>= 2.0.0, < 2.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Qiskit SDK version
    Run 'pip show qiskit' or 'python -c "import qiskit; print(qiskit.__version__)"' to retrieve the installed version number
    Affected if The version displayed is >= 0.43.0 and < 1.4.6, or >= 2.0.0 and < 2.4.2
  2. Verify Qiskit parser is in use
    Check if your code or workflows invoke Qiskit parsing functions such as qiskit.circuit.assemble, qiskit.qasm.Qasm, or circuit.from_qasm_str() which utilize the internal parser
    Affected if Parser functions are called with untrusted or user-supplied QASM or circuit definition input
  3. Inspect for crash logs or segmentation faults
    Review application logs, system logs (dmesg), or crash reports for segmentation faults occurring during Qiskit parsing operations
    Affected if Segmentation faults are logged in proximity to Qiskit parser invocations with no other identifiable cause
  4. Check Python recursion depth configuration
    Run 'python -c "import sys; print(sys.getrecursionlimit())"' to see current recursion limit; default is typically 1000
    Affected if The recursion limit is set very high (above default) which could exacerbate the uncontrolled recursion condition

Your environment is affected if Qiskit SDK version falls within 0.43.0 to 1.4.5 or 2.0.0 to 2.4.1 AND the parser processes external or untrusted input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.4.6 / 2.4.2 or later
Fixed in 1.4.62.4.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of IBM Qiskit SDK beyond 2.5.0 once available, or implement input validation/recursion limits in the parser to prevent stack overflow.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to Qiskit 1.4.6 (for 0.x/1.x users) or 2.4.2 (for 2.x users)

  1. Check current installed Qiskit version using: pip show qiskit or python -c "import qiskit; print(qiskit.__version__)"
  2. Determine which major version branch you are on (0.x/1.x or 2.x)
  3. If using Qiskit 0.x or 1.x: upgrade to version 1.4.6 or later using: pip install --upgrade qiskit>=1.4.6
  4. If using Qiskit 2.x: upgrade to version 2.4.2 or later using: pip install --upgrade qiskit>=2.4.2
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
Caveat Review the Qiskit release notes for 1.4.6 and 2.4.2 to check for any breaking changes relevant to your codebase

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Qiskit Software Development Kit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4870 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4870 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data