CVE-2026-49268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote attacker can inject LDAP special characters into the Distinguished Name (DN) construction in DefaultLdapRealm class. User-supplied username input is directly concatenated into the LDAP DN template without any escaping of RFC 2253 special characters. This allows an attacker to manipulate the DN structure used for LDAP bind authentication, potentially bypassing authentication or impersonating other users. This issue affects all Apache Shiro versions through 2.2.0, and 3.0.0-alpha-1 when using DefaultLdapRealm Upgrade to Apache Shiro 2.2.1 or 3.0.0-alpha-2 or later, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDefaultLdapRealm in Apache Shiro versions through 2.2.0 and 3.0.0-alpha-1 directly concatenates user-supplied usernames into LDAP DN templates without RFC 2253 special character escaping, allowing LDAP injection that can manipulate the DN structure for authentication bypass or user impersonation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.2.1= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Shiro versionLocate the shiro-core JAR file in your classpath or check your pom.xml/gradle build file for the org.apache.shiro:shiro-core dependency versionAffected if The version is below 2.2.1 or exactly 3.0.0-alpha-1
-
Confirm DefaultLdapRealm is in useSearch your codebase for 'DefaultLdapRealm' or 'LdapRealm' class references in your Shiro configuration files (shiro.ini, Spring beans, or Java config classes)Affected if DefaultLdapRealm is configured as the LDAP authentication realm
-
Verify LDAP DN template configurationInspect your LDAP realm configuration for the 'userDnTemplate' property or similar DN template settings that incorporate usernames directly into the DN patternAffected if A userDnTemplate is configured (e.g., 'uid={0},ou=users,dc=example,dc=com')
-
Inspect username handling before LDAP bindReview code that passes username to the LDAP realm's authenticate method or searches for any custom escaping/sanitization logic applied to usernames before LDAP operationsAffected if Usernames are passed directly to LDAP without RFC 2253 escaping (no use of LdapUtils.escapeLdapDN or similar escaping methods)
You are affected if you run Apache Shiro version below 2.2.1 or exactly 3.0.0-alpha-1, use DefaultLdapRealm with a configured userDnTemplate, and user-supplied usernames reach the LDAP authentication without proper RFC 2253 DN character escaping.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2.1
Upgrade to Apache Shiro 2.2.1 or 3.0.0-alpha-2 or later to apply the fixed DN escaping logic.
Apache Shiro 2.2.1 (stable) or 3.0.0-alpha-2
- 1. Identify all dependencies on Apache Shiro in your project using your build tool (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, etc.)
- 2. Locate the current Apache Shiro version in your dependency management
- 3. If using Shiro 2.x: Update the Shiro version to 2.2.1 or later
- 4. If using Shiro 3.0.0-alpha-1: Update to 3.0.0-alpha-2 or later
- 5. Rebuild your project to fetch the updated dependencies
- 6. Run your test suite to verify the application still functions correctly after the upgrade
- 7. Specifically test any LDAP authentication flows to confirm the fix works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data