CVE-2026-52948
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies(). A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the `arg > INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal `(int)m < 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`. The truncated value is then assigned to `client->adapter->timeout` (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the `schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS). Fix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`. [wsa: move the comment as well]
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow in Linux kernel's I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl where user-provided timeout value is checked against INT_MAX but then multiplied by 10, causing overflow. The truncated result becomes negative when cast to signed 32-bit int, leading to premature wait_for_completion_timeout() returns and SMBus state machine corruption, constituting local DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.29.1, < 5.10.259>= 5.11, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 2.6.29= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or check /proc/version to get the exact kernel version stringAffected if The version falls within any of the affected ranges: < 5.10.259, >= 5.11 and < 5.15.210, >= 5.16 and < 6.1.176, >= 6.2 and < 6.6.143, >= 6.7 and < 6.12.94, >= 6.13 and < 6.18.36, >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, or equals 2.6.29 or 7.1
-
Check if I2C subsystem is activeList I2C adapter devices by running 'ls -la /dev/i2c-*' or check for loaded I2C kernel modules with 'lsmod | grep i2c'Affected if I2C adapters exist in /dev/ or i2c-related modules are loaded, indicating the vulnerable ioctl interface is accessible
-
Verify I2C device nodes are accessibleCheck for I2C character devices: 'ls /dev/i2c* 2>/dev/null' and note their permissionsAffected if The /dev/i2c-* device nodes exist and the calling user has read/write access to them (typically requires root or group access)
-
Confirm presence of I2C hardware or driversExamine /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ or run 'i2cdetect -l' if i2c-tools is installed to list adaptersAffected if I2C adapters or devices are enumerated in the system, meaning the I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl could be invoked against them
You are affected if your kernel version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have active I2C adapters/devices accessible on the system that can accept the I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl call.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2595.15.2106.1.176
Apply the kernel patch to bound user argument to INT_MAX / 10 before multiplication, preventing the overflow that leads to negative timeout values.
Upgrade to kernel 5.10.259, 5.15.210, 6.1.176, or 6.6.143 (or later) depending on the branch in use
- Identify the i2c-dev driver source file (typically drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c)
- Locate the I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl handler code
- Modify the validation check to bound the user-provided timeout argument to INT_MAX/10 before multiplication
- The check should be changed from `if (arg > INT_MAX)` to `if (arg > INT_MAX / 10)`
- Recompile the kernel with the fix applied
- Reboot systems running affected kernel versions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-52948 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-52948 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data