CVE-2026-52956
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Fix potential out-of-bounds access in __ceph_x_decrypt() In __ceph_x_decrypt(), a part of the buffer p is interpreted as a ceph_x_encrypt_header, and the magic field of this struct is accessed. This happens without any guarantee that the buffer is large enough to hold this struct. The function parameter ciphertext_len represents the length of the ciphertext to decrypt and is guaranteed to be at most the remaining size of the allocated buffer p. However, this value is not necessarily greater than sizeof(ceph_x_encrypt_header). E.g., a message frame of type FRAME_TAG_AUTH_REPLY_MORE, that is just as long to hold the ciphertext at its end with a ciphertext_len of 8 or less, can trigger an out-of-bounds memory access when accessing hdr->magic. This patch fixes the issue by adding a check to ensure that the decrypted plaintext in the buffer is large enough to represent at least the ceph_x_encrypt_header.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the Linux kernel's libceph module, the __ceph_x_decrypt() function accesses a buffer as a ceph_x_encrypt_header struct without validating that the buffer is large enough to hold it. Specifically, the hdr->magic field is accessed when ciphertext_len may be smaller than sizeof(ceph_x_encrypt_header). This out-of-bounds read can be triggered by crafted Ceph messages with small ciphertext_len values (8 or less), such as FRAME_TAG_AUTH_REPLY_MORE frames.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.9.6, < 4.10>= 4.10, < 7.0.10= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within >= 4.9.6 and < 4.10, OR >= 4.10 and < 7.0.10, OR equals 7.1
-
Verify libceph kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep ceph' or check /sys/module/ for ceph-related modulesAffected if The ceph, libceph, or related kernel modules are loaded, indicating Ceph client functionality is in use
-
Check for Ceph configurationLook for /etc/ceph/ directory or ceph.conf configuration file, and check for cephx authentication key files in /etc/ceph/Affected if Ceph configuration exists and the system is configured to communicate with Ceph clusters
-
Inspect Ceph network connectionsRun 'ss -tnp' or 'netstat -tnp' to identify active connections to Ceph monitor or OSD ports (ports 3300, 6789, and 6800-7300)Affected if The system has active network connections to Ceph endpoints, enabling the attack vector
-
Verify Ceph authentication messagesCapture network traffic using tcpdump on Ceph ports during authentication handshake, specifically looking for FRAME_TAG_AUTH_REPLY_MORE message framesAffected if Untrusted Ceph endpoints are reachable and the system performs Ceph authentication exchanges
The system is affected if the kernel version is in the vulnerable range AND libceph is actively used to communicate with Ceph endpoints, allowing specially crafted authentication reply messages to trigger the out-of-bounds read.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.107.0.10
Apply the kernel patch which adds a bounds check to verify the plaintext buffer is large enough to contain the ceph_x_encrypt_header before dereferencing hdr->magic. Update to a kernel version containing this fix.
Linux Kernel 7.0.10 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
- 2. Check if the current version is affected: versions >= 4.9.6 and < 4.10, or >= 4.10 and < 7.0.10, or exactly 7.1
- 3. Plan a kernel upgrade to a fixed release (7.0.10 or later point release) that includes the patch for the out-of-bounds read in __ceph_x_decrypt()
- 4. Before upgrading in production, test the new kernel in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with hardware and workloads
- 5. Apply the upgrade using the distribution's standard kernel update process (e.g., `apt-get dist-upgrade`, `yum update`, or vendor-specific tools)
- 6. Reboot into the new kernel and verify the system boots successfully
- 7. Verify the fix is present by checking that the ceph module loads without errors and libceph functionality works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-52956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-52956 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data