CVE-2026-52957
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Fix potential null-ptr-deref in decode_choose_args() A message of type CEPH_MSG_OSD_MAP contains an OSD map that itself contains a CRUSH map. When decoding this CRUSH map in crush_decode(), an array of max_buckets CRUSH buckets is decoded, where some indices may not refer to actual buckets and are therefore set to NULL. The received CRUSH map may optionally contain choose_args that get decoded in decode_choose_args(). When decoding a crush_choose_arg_map, a series of choose_args for different buckets is decoded, with the bucket_index being read from the incoming message. It is only checked that the bucket index does not exceed max_buckets, but not that it doesn't point to an index with a NULL bucket. If a (potentially corrupted) message contains a crush_choose_arg_map including such a bucket_index, a null pointer dereference may occur in the subsequent processing when attempting to access the bucket with the given index. This patch fixes the issue by extending the affected check. Now, it is only attempted to access the bucket if it is not NULL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNull pointer dereference in libceph's decode_choose_args() when processing CEPH_MSG_OSD_MAP messages containing CRUSH maps. The code validates bucket_index doesn't exceed max_buckets but fails to check if the bucket at that index is NULL. A corrupted message with a bucket_index pointing to a NULL bucket triggers the dereference.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.13.1, < 5.10.258>= 5.11, < 5.15.209>= 5.16, < 6.1.175>= 6.2, < 6.6.141>= 6.7, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10= 4.13= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the installed kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within the affected ranges: >= 4.13.1, < 5.10.258; >= 5.11, < 5.15.209; >= 5.16, < 6.1.175; >= 6.2, < 6.6.141; >= 6.7, < 6.12.91; >= 6.13, < 6.18.33; >= 6.19, < 7.0.10; = 4.13; = 7.1
-
Verify libceph kernel module presenceRun 'lsmod | grep ceph' or check if CONFIG_CEPH_LIB=y or =m in /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gzAffected if The libceph or ceph module is loaded (lsmod shows it) or built into the kernel (CONFIG_CEPH_LIB=y or =m)
-
Check for Ceph client or OSD configurationLook for /etc/ceph/ directory, or run 'ceph -s' or check for ceph-related processes (ceph-osd, ceph-mon, ceph-mds)Affected if The system has Ceph configuration files, active Ceph processes, or is acting as a Ceph OSD server receiving OSD map messages
You are affected if you are running a vulnerable kernel version from the specified ranges and your system uses libceph functionality (has Ceph OSD clients or is a Ceph OSD server that processes CEPH_MSG_OSD_MAP messages).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2585.15.2096.1.175
Apply the kernel patch that adds a NULL check for the bucket pointer before attempting to access it in decode_choose_args(). Update to a kernel version containing the fix.
5.10.258 / 5.15.209 / 6.1.175 / 6.6.141 (depending on your current branch)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which version branch your current kernel belongs to (e.g., 5.10.x, 5.15.x, 6.1.x, 6.2.x)
- Upgrade to the fixed version for your branch: for 5.10.x upgrade to >= 5.10.258, for 5.15.x upgrade to >= 5.15.209, for 6.1.x upgrade to >= 6.1.175, or for 6.2+ upgrade to >= 6.6.141
- On Debian/Ubuntu: `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade` or install specific kernel package
- On RHEL/CentOS: `sudo yum update kernel` or `sudo dnf update kernel`
- On Fedora: `sudo dnf update kernel`
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel: `sudo reboot`
- Verify the fix is applied by checking `uname -r` shows a version >= the fixed version for your branch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-52957 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-52957 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data