CVE-2026-52973
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc Currently need_futex_hash_allocate_default() depends on strict pthread semantics, abusing CLONE_THREAD. This breaks the non-concurrency assumptions when doing the mm->futex_ref pcpu allocations, leading to bugs[0] when sharing the mm in other ways; ie: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in futex_hash_put ... where the +1 bias can end up on a percpu counter that mm->futex_ref no longer points at. Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child runs alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier CLONE_VM.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLinux kernel futex implementation vulnerability where need_futex_hash_allocate_default() incorrectly depends on CLONE_THREAD rather than CLONE_VM, causing a use-after-free (KASAN: slab-use-after-free in futex_hash_put). The +1 bias can end up on a percpu counter that mm->futex_ref no longer points at when mm is shared via CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.17.1, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10= 6.17= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within these ranges: >= 6.17.1 and < 6.18.33; >= 6.19 and < 7.0.10; equals 6.17; or equals 7.1
-
Verify futex is availableCheck for existence of `/proc/sys/fs/futex/` or run `grep -i futex /proc/mounts`Affected if Futex filesystem or sysfs entries exist (futex is active in the kernel)
-
Check for processes using unusual clone flagsMonitor for processes created with CLONE_VM (0x200) but without CLONE_THREAD (0x20000) - this typically requires tracing tools like `strace -f` or `perf` to observe clone() syscallsAffected if Any process on the system uses clone() with CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD flag (rare, but possible with certain custom threading libraries or container runtimes)
The system is affected if the running kernel version is in the affected ranges AND processes using CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD are present, leading to potential use-after-free in futex_hash_put operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.337.0.10
Apply the upstream kernel patch that changes the check from CLONE_THREAD to any CLONE_VM clone (excluding vfork), recompile and deploy the patched kernel.
Linux Kernel 6.18.33 or later, or 7.0.10 or later (depending on which major version branch you are on)
- Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using `uname -r`
- If running kernel version >= 6.17.1 and < 6.18.33, upgrade to kernel version 6.18.33 or later
- If running kernel version >= 6.19 and < 7.0.10, upgrade to kernel version 7.0.10 or later
- If running kernel version 6.17.x (where x < 1), upgrade to 6.18.33 or later
- If running kernel version 7.1, upgrade to 7.0.10 or later
- After kernel upgrade, reboot the system to load the fixed kernel
- Verify the fix by checking that the futex_hash_put use-after-free no longer occurs under the previously triggering conditions (sharing mm via CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-52973 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-52973 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data