CVE-2026-53015
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: unify lcn as u64 for 32-bit platforms As sashiko reported [1], `lcn` was typed as `unsigned long` (or `unsigned int` sometimes), which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit platforms, which causes `(lcn << lclusterbits)` to be truncated at 4 GiB. In order to consolidate the logic, just use `u64` consistently around the codebase. [1] https://sashiko.dev/r/20260420034612.1899973-1-hsiangkao%40linux.alibaba.com
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the Linux kernel's erofs filesystem, the logical cluster number (lcn) variable was incorrectly typed as `unsigned long` or `unsigned int`, which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit platforms. When performing `(lcn << lclusterbits)` to calculate cluster offsets, the result gets truncated at 4 GiB, potentially causing incorrect data access or file system corruption when handling files/clusters beyond 4 GiB on 32-bit systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.3, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel architectureRun `uname -m` or `getconf LONG_BIT` to determine if running a 32-bit kernel (i386/i686 indicates 32-bit, x86_64 indicates 64-bit)Affected if The system runs a 32-bit kernel (i386/i686). The truncation bug only affects 32-bit platforms where 'unsigned long' is 32 bits.
-
Check kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within: >= 5.3 and < 6.12.91, OR >= 6.13 and < 6.18.33, OR >= 6.19 and < 7.0.10
-
Check if erofs filesystem is availableRun `cat /proc/filesystems | grep erofs` or check if erofs is listed in available filesystem typesAffected if The erofs filesystem is supported and available on the system
-
Check for mounted erofs filesystemsRun `mount | grep -E 'erofs|type.erofs'` or `findmnt -t erofs` to list any erofs mountsAffected if Any erofs filesystems are currently mounted and in use
-
Identify large files on erofs mountsFor each erofs mount point, use `find <mountpoint> -type f -size +4G` to locate files larger than 4 GiBAffected if Files or clusters larger than 4 GiB exist on any mounted erofs filesystem
A system is affected if it runs a 32-bit Linux kernel with a version in the affected ranges, uses the erofs filesystem, and handles files/clusters exceeding 4 GiB, causing potential incorrect data access or filesystem corruption.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.12.916.18.337.0.10
This is a kernel bug fix requiring a type change from 32-bit to 64-bit (u64). No end-user mitigation is available; organizations should apply kernel updates when available.
6.12.91 or 6.18.33 or 7.0.10 (depending on current branch)
- Identify your current kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which version branch you are on (5.3-6.12.x, 6.13-6.18.x, or 6.19-7.0.x)
- Upgrade to the next fixed version in your branch: 6.12.91 for 5.3-6.12.x, 6.18.33 for 6.13-6.18.x, or 7.0.10 for 6.19-7.0.x
- Verify the upgrade using `uname -r` after rebooting
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53015 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53015 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data