CVE-2026-53021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: core: Fix integer overflow in UNMAP bounds check sbc_execute_unmap() checks LBA + range does not exceed the device capacity, but does not guard against LBA + range wrapping around on 64-bit overflow. Add an overflow check matching the pattern already used for WRITE_SAME in the same file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in sbc_execute_unmap() within the Linux kernel's SCSI target subsystem. The function validates that LBA + range does not exceed device capacity but fails to prevent 64-bit integer overflow where LBA + range wraps around, potentially allowing out-of-bounds memory access. The fix adds an overflow check following the same pattern already implemented for WRITE_SAME in the same file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.10, < 5.10.258>= 5.11, < 5.15.209>= 5.16, < 6.1.175>= 6.2, < 6.6.141>= 6.7, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel version against affected rangesRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the installed kernel version. Compare against: < 5.10.258, 5.11-5.15.209, 5.16-6.1.175, 6.2-6.6.141, 6.7-6.12.91, 6.13-6.18.33, 6.19-7.0.10Affected if The installed kernel version falls within any of the affected version ranges
-
Verify SCSI target subsystem is loadedCheck if the SCSI target module is active by running 'lsmod | grep target' or checking for /sys/kernel/config/target/ directory existenceAffected if The SCSI target subsystem (target_core_mod) is loaded and active, as sbc_execute_unmap() is only invoked in this context
-
Confirm UNMAP command support is enabledCheck if the system uses thin-provisioned LUNs or SCSI UNMAP by examining target configuration files in /etc/target/ or running 'targetcli ls' if targetcli is installedAffected if The system exposes thin-provisioned SCSI logical units that accept UNMAP commands, triggering the vulnerable code path
If the kernel version is in an affected range AND the SCSI target subsystem with UNMAP-capable LUNs is in use, the environment is vulnerable to the integer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2585.15.2096.1.175
Apply the kernel patch that adds overflow validation to prevent LBA + range from wrapping on 64-bit overflow, as the vulnerability has been resolved in the upstream kernel.
6.6.141 (or later stable in your kernel branch)
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
- 2. Determine which kernel branch (5.10.x, 5.11-5.15.x, 5.16-6.1.x, or 6.2-6.6.x) the system is running
- 3. For systems on 5.10.x branch: upgrade to kernel version 5.10.258 or later
- 4. For systems on 5.11-5.15.x branch: upgrade to kernel version 5.15.209 or later
- 5. For systems on 5.16-6.1.x branch: upgrade to kernel version 6.1.175 or later
- 6. For systems on 6.2-6.6.x branch: upgrade to kernel version 6.6.141 or later
- 7. Apply the kernel upgrade via distribution package manager (e.g., apt-get dist-upgrade, yum update, or dnf upgrade)
- 8. Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data