CVE-2026-53067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: pci-ep-msi: Fix error unwind and prevent double alloc pci_epf_alloc_doorbell() stores the allocated doorbell message array in epf->db_msg/epf->num_db before requesting MSI vectors. If MSI allocation fails, the array is freed but the EPF state may still point to freed memory. Clear epf->db_msg and epf->num_db on the MSI allocation failure path so that later cleanup cannot double-free the array and callers can retry allocation. Also return -EBUSY when doorbells have already been allocated to prevent leaking or overwriting an existing allocation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the Linux kernel PCI endpoint MSI code, pci_epf_alloc_doorbell() stores an allocated doorbell message array before requesting MSI vectors. If MSI allocation fails, the array is freed but the EPF state still points to freed memory, creating a double-free/use-after-free vulnerability. Additionally, no check prevents re-allocation of already-allocated doorbells, potentially causing memory leaks or overwriting.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.17, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel versionAffected if Kernel version is 6.17.x, 6.18.x through 6.18.32, 6.19.x, or 7.0.x through 7.0.9 (falls within >= 6.17, < 6.18.33 or >= 6.19, < 7.0.10)
-
Verify PCI endpoint support is enabledCheck kernel config with 'grep -i CONFIG_PCI_ENDPOINT /boot/config-$(uname -r)' or check /sys/module/pci_epf* existenceAffected if CONFIG_PCI_ENDPOINT=y or CONFIG_PCI_ENDPOINT=m (module loaded), meaning the PCI endpoint framework is active
-
Check for PCI endpoint devices in useExamine /sys/bus/pci-epf/devices/ or run 'ls /sys/bus/pci-epf/devices/' to list registered endpoint functionsAffected if Any PCI endpoint function devices are registered, as the vulnerable code path (pci_epf_alloc_doorbell) executes when doorbell allocation is requested
-
Identify endpoint function driversRun 'lsmod | grep -i pci' and check 'lspci -v' output for 'Endpoint' in device class, or check /sys/class/pci_epf/Affected if PCI endpoint function drivers are loaded or bound to devices, triggering the vulnerable code path
You are affected if running an affected kernel version (6.17 to 6.18.32 or 6.19 to 7.0.9) AND the PCI endpoint framework (CONFIG_PCI_ENDPOINT) is enabled with endpoint devices or drivers in use that call pci_epf_alloc_doorbell().
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.337.0.10
Apply the kernel patch that clears epf->db_msg and epf->num_db on MSI allocation failure and returns -EBUSY when doorbells are already allocated. Update to a kernel version containing this fix.
Linux Kernel 6.18.33 or 7.0.10 (whichever branch applies)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- If running kernel >= 6.17 and < 6.18.33: upgrade to kernel version 6.18.33 or later within the 6.18.y stable branch
- If running kernel >= 6.19 and < 7.0.10: upgrade to kernel version 7.0.10 or later within the 7.0.y stable branch
- Verify the fix is applied by checking that the pci-ep-msi code properly clears epf->db_msg and epf->num_db on failure and returns -EBUSY for duplicate allocations
- Reboot into the new kernel and confirm PCI endpoint functionality works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data