CVE-2026-53095
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix abuse of kprobe_write_ctx via freplace uprobe programs are allowed to modify struct pt_regs. Since the actual program type of uprobe is KPROBE, it can be abused to modify struct pt_regs via kprobe+freplace when the kprobe attaches to kernel functions. For example, SEC("?kprobe") int kprobe(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; } SEC("?freplace") int freplace_kprobe(struct pt_regs *regs) { regs->di = 0; return 0; } freplace_kprobe prog will attach to kprobe prog. kprobe prog will attach to a kernel function. Without this patch, when the kernel function runs, its first arg will always be set as 0 via the freplace_kprobe prog. To fix the abuse of kprobe_write_ctx=true via kprobe+freplace, disallow attaching freplace programs on kprobe programs with different kprobe_write_ctx values.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Linux kernel BPF subsystem allows freplace (function replacement) programs to attach to kprobe programs. A vulnerability exists where freplace programs can bypass kprobe_write_ctx restrictions - if a kprobe has kprobe_write_ctx=true, a freplace program attached to it can also modify struct pt_regs even when it shouldn't have that permission. This allows unauthorized modification of kernel function arguments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.18, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or read /proc/version and compare the version numbers to the affected ranges: >= 6.18, < 6.18.33 and >= 6.19, < 7.0.10Affected if The installed kernel version falls within any of the affected ranges
-
Identify loaded BPF kprobe programsUse 'bpftool prog list' or 'cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions' to enumerate kprobe-type BPF programs currently loadedAffected if Any kprobe-type BPF programs are attached to the kernel
-
Check for freplace (function replacement) BPF programsUse 'bpftool prog list' and examine program types, looking for freplace programs or programs with type 'freplace' that are attached to kprobe attachmentsAffected if Any freplace programs are attached to kprobe program attachments
-
Verify kprobe_write_ctx flag configurationExamine the kprobe_write_ctx attribute of any kprobe programs using 'bpftool prog show' or by inspecting the BPF program metadataAffected if A kprobe program with kprobe_write_ctx=0 has a freplace program attached with kprobe_write_ctx=1, or vice versa (mismatched values)
-
Check for uprobe programs with KPROBE typeUse 'bpftool prog list' to identify uprobe programs that have KPROBE type and are involved in freplace attachmentsAffected if Any uprobe programs with KPROBE type are attached via freplace to kprobe programs enabling argument modification
You are affected if your kernel version is between 6.18 and 6.18.32 (inclusive) or between 6.19 and 7.0.9 (inclusive), AND you have BPF kprobe programs with attached freplace programs that have mismatched kprobe_write_ctx values.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.337.0.10
Apply the kernel patch that enforces matching kprobe_write_ctx values between kprobe and freplace programs during attachment, preventing the bypass. Ensure Linux kernel is updated to the patched version.
Linux Kernel 6.18.33 or 7.0.10 (or later stable release)
- Identify current kernel version using `uname -r`
- If running kernel >= 6.18 and < 6.18.33, upgrade to kernel 6.18.33 or later
- If running kernel >= 6.19 and < 7.0.10, upgrade to kernel 7.0.10 or later
- After upgrade, reboot the system to load the fixed kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version matches a fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53095 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53095 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data