CVE-2026-53096
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path The DEVMAP_HASH branch in dev_map_redirect_multi() uses hlist_for_each_entry_safe() to iterate hash buckets, but this function runs under RCU protection (called from xdp_do_generic_redirect_map() in softirq context). Concurrent writers (__dev_map_hash_update_elem, dev_map_hash_delete_elem) modify the list using RCU primitives (hlist_add_head_rcu, hlist_del_rcu). hlist_for_each_entry_safe() performs plain pointer dereferences without rcu_dereference(), missing the acquire barrier needed to pair with writers' rcu_assign_pointer(). On weakly-ordered architectures (ARM64, POWER), a reader can observe a partially-constructed node. It also defeats CONFIG_PROVE_RCU lockdep validation and KCSAN data-race detection. Replace with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() using rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as the lockdep condition, consistent with the rcu_dereference_check() used in the DEVMAP (non-hash) branch of the same functions. Also fix the same incorrect lockdep_is_held(&dtab->index_lock) condition in dev_map_enqueue_multi(), where the lock is not held either.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the Linux kernel BPF subsystem, the DEVMAP_HASH branch in dev_map_redirect_multi() incorrectly uses hlist_for_each_entry_safe() for RCU-protected hash bucket iteration instead of hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(). This missing rcu_dereference() breaks the acquire barrier pairing with writers' rcu_assign_pointer(), allowing readers on weakly-ordered architectures (ARM64, POWER) to observe partially-constructed nodes. The same incorrect lockdep condition exists in dev_map_enqueue_multi().
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.14, < 5.15.209>= 5.16, < 6.1.175>= 6.2, < 6.6.141>= 6.7, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel version, then compare it to the version where the fix was applied (the fix replaces hlist_for_each_entry_safe with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu in dev_map_redirect_multi)Affected if The kernel version is older than the fixed version and BPF with devmap is in use
-
Verify BPF devmap support is enabledCheck kernel configuration for CONFIG_BPF and CONFIG_BPF_DEVMAP, or check if /sys/kernel/debug/bpf/ is accessible and contains devmap entriesAffected if BPF devmap support is compiled into the kernel and actively used
-
Check for active devmap usageInspect BPF maps via 'bpftool map show' or check /sys/fs/bpf/ for devmap-type maps that are attached to network interfacesAffected if Any devmap entries exist (the race condition triggers during concurrent dev_map_redirect_multi or dev_map_enqueue_multi operations)
-
Identify system architectureRun 'uname -m' or check 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' to determine the CPU architectureAffected if The system runs on ARM64 (aarch64) or POWER (ppc64le/ppc64) architectures, which are weakly-ordered and vulnerable to the partially-constructed node issue
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version on ARM64 or POWER architecture, has BPF devmap enabled, and has active devmap entries being used concurrently.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.15.2096.1.1756.6.141
Apply the kernel patch to replace hlist_for_each_entry_safe() with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() using rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as the lockdep condition, and correct the lockdep_is_held() condition in dev_map_enqueue_multi(). Update to a kernel version containing this fix.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53096 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53096 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data