CVE-2026-53101
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: mt7921: fix potential deadlock in mt7921_roc_abort_sync roc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds dev->mt76.mutex, while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work() to finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex, both sides block and no progress is possible. This deadlock can occur during station removal when mt76_sta_state() -> mt76_sta_remove() -> mt7921_mac_sta_remove() -> mt7921_roc_abort_sync() invokes cancel_work_sync() while roc_work() is still running and holding dev->mt76.mutex. This avoids the mutex deadlock and preserves exactly-once work ownership.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA deadlock vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's mt7921 WiFi driver where roc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds dev->mt76.mutex while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work() to finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex during station removal (via mt76_sta_state() -> mt76_sta_remove() -> mt7921_mac_sta_remove() -> mt7921_roc_abort_sync()), both sides block indefinitely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.9, < 6.12.95>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if mt7921 WiFi driver is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep mt7921' or check 'lspci -k' for Network controller using mt7921 driverAffected if No mt7921 driver loaded means not affected
-
Identify kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel versionAffected if Kernel version falls outside these ranges: >=6.9 and <6.12.95, >=6.13 and <6.18.33, >=6.19 and <7.0.10 - if outside, not affected
-
Verify driver source contains vulnerable functionCheck if /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7921/ exists, or inspect driver source for mt7921_roc_abort_sync functionAffected if Driver module exists with the vulnerable function code present in affected kernel versions
-
Confirm WiFi hardware is activeRun 'iw dev' or 'ip link show' to list wireless interfaces, then 'ethtool -i <interface>' to confirm mt7921 driver associationAffected if No active mt7921-managed interface means the deadlock scenario cannot be triggered
System is affected only if mt7921 WiFi driver is loaded, the kernel version is within the affected ranges, and the vulnerable mt7921_roc_abort_sync function exists in the driver code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.12.956.18.337.0.10
Apply the kernel patch that restructures mutex handling in mt7921_roc_abort_sync() to avoid acquiring the mutex when cancel_work_sync() is called, preventing the circular wait condition while preserving exactly-once work semantics.
Linux Kernel 6.12.95+, 6.18.33+, or 7.0.10+ depending on which major branch you are on
- Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which version range your current kernel falls into (>= 6.9, < 6.12.95; >= 6.13, < 6.18.33; or >= 6.19, < 7.0.10)
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to a version that includes the fix: 6.12.95 or later for the 6.12.y branch, 6.18.33 or later for the 6.13-6.18 branch, or 7.0.10 or later for the 6.19+ branch
- Use your distribution's package manager to install the updated kernel (e.g., `apt update && apt install linux-image-<version>` for Debian/Ubuntu, or `dnf update kernel` for Fedora/RHEL)
- Reboot the system to load the fixed kernel
- Verify the new kernel version is running with `uname -r`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53101 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53101 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data