CVE-2026-53123
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: wake raid456 reshape waiters before suspend During raid456 reshape, direct IO across the reshape position can sleep in raid5_make_request() waiting for reshape progress while still holding an active_io reference. If userspace then freezes reshape and writes md/suspend_lo or md/suspend_hi, mddev_suspend() kills active_io and waits for all in-flight IO to drain. This can deadlock: the IO needs reshape progress to continue, but the reshape thread is already frozen, so the active_io reference is never dropped and suspend never completes. raid5_prepare_suspend() already wakes wait_for_reshape for dm-raid. Do the same for normal md suspend when reshape is already interrupted, so waiting raid456 IO can abort, drop its reference, and let suspend finish. The mdadm test tests/25raid456-reshape-deadlock reproduces the hang.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA deadlock vulnerability in Linux kernel's MD RAID456 implementation where direct I/O can block waiting for reshape progress while holding an active_io reference. If userspace then suspends the reshape via md/suspend_lo or md/suspend_hi, the I/O cannot complete (reshape frozen) and cannot release its reference, causing suspend to hang indefinitely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.7, < 6.12.91>= 6.13, < 6.18.33>= 6.19, < 7.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your kernel versionRun `uname -r` or check `/proc/version` to get the exact kernel version numberAffected if The version falls within >= 6.7, < 6.12.91 OR >= 6.13, < 6.18.33 OR >= 6.19, < 7.0.10
-
Check if md raid456 arrays existExamine `/proc/mdstat` or list `/sys/block/md*/md/` to see if any RAID 4/5/6 (raid456) arrays are configuredAffected if Any raid456 arrays are present and active
-
Verify if reshape operations are in progressLook at `/proc/mdstat` for lines containing 'reshape' or check `cat /sys/block/md*/md/reshape_position`Affected if A reshape operation is currently active on any raid456 array
-
Check for direct IO usage on the arrayMonitor I/O patterns or check application configs for O_DIRECT flag usage when accessing devices in /proc/mdstatAffected if Direct IO is being performed against the raid456 array during reshape
You are affected if your kernel version is in the vulnerable range AND you have an active raid456 array undergoing reshape with direct IO traffic while suspend parameters (md/suspend_lo or md/suspend_hi) are in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.12.916.18.337.0.10
Apply the kernel patch that wakes raid456 reshape waiters before suspend (similar to existing dm-raid handling), allowing waiting I/O to abort and release its reference so suspend can complete.
7.0.10 (or 6.12.91/6.18.33 depending on preferred stable branch)
- Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Determine which affected version range your current kernel falls into (6.7-6.12.x, 6.13-6.18.x, or 6.19-7.0.x)
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to a fixed version: 6.12.91 or later for 6.12.x branch, 6.18.33 or later for 6.18.x branch, or 7.0.10 or later for 7.0.x branch
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- Verify the kernel version after reboot using 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53123 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53123 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data