CVE-2026-53246
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate cached peer INIT chunk length in COOKIE_ECHO processing When a listening SCTP server processes a COOKIE_ECHO chunk, the cached peer INIT chunk embedded after the cookie is parsed and its parameters are later walked by sctp_process_init() using sctp_walk_params(). However, the chunk header length of this cached INIT chunk was not validated against the remaining buffer in the COOKIE_ECHO payload. If the length field is inflated, the parameter walk can run beyond the actual received data, leading to out-of-bounds reads and potential memory corruption during later parameter handling (e.g. STATE_COOKIE processing and kmemdup() copies). Add a bounds check in sctp_unpack_cookie() to ensure the cached INIT chunk length does not exceed the available data in the COOKIE_ECHO buffer before it is used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SCTP implementation in the Linux kernel fails to validate the chunk header length of a cached peer INIT chunk embedded within COOKIE_ECHO messages. When processing COOKIE_ECHO, the cached INIT is parsed and its parameters are walked without verifying the length doesn't exceed the available buffer. An attacker can exploit this by providing an inflated length field to trigger out-of-bounds reads during parameter walking, leading to memory corruption during STATE_COOKIE processing and kmemdup() operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.12.1, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 2.6.12= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' and compare the version number to the affected ranges: < 6.18.36, >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, = 7.1, or = 2.6.12Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the affected ranges (< 6.18.36, >= 6.19 to < 7.0.13, = 7.1, = 2.6.12)
-
Verify SCTP module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep sctp' to check if the SCTP kernel module is currently loadedAffected if The sctp module appears in the loaded modules list
-
Check SCTP is built into kernelCheck if SCTP support is compiled directly into the kernel by running 'cat /boot/config-$(uname -r) | grep CONFIG_IP_SCTP' or checking kernel configuration filesAffected if CONFIG_IP_SCTP=y or CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m is set (y means built-in, m means module can be loaded)
-
Confirm SCTP is actively in useCheck for active SCTP associations or listeners: run 'ss -s' and look for SCTP lines, or check 'cat /proc/net/sctp/snmp' to see if SCTP traffic is being processedAffected if SCTP connections or traffic are present, indicating the SCTP stack is actively processing packets
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version AND has SCTP enabled or loaded, since the flaw only triggers when processing COOKIE_ECHO messages through the SCTP protocol stack.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.18.367.0.13
Apply the kernel patch adding bounds validation in sctp_unpack_cookie() to reject COOKIE_ECHO chunks with oversized cached INIT lengths; if SCTP is not required, consider disabling the module as a temporary mitigation.
Linux Kernel 6.18.36 or later for the 6.x branch; Linux Kernel 7.0.13 or later for the 7.x branch
- Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Determine which branch your kernel version belongs to: if >= 2.6.12.1 and < 6.18.36, upgrade to 6.18.36 or later; if >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, upgrade to 7.0.13 or later; if version 2.6.12, upgrade to a patched version; if version 7.1, upgrade to 7.1.x where the fix is included
- For distribution kernels (e.g., Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian), check for and apply the latest kernel security updates that address this CVE
- Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version and confirming the SCTP fix is present in the changelog or by examining the patched function sctp_unpack_cookie() in the kernel source
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53246 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53246 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data