CVE-2026-53254
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers The RFCOMM MCC handlers cast skb->data to protocol-specific structs without validating skb->len first. A malicious remote device can send truncated MCC frames and trigger out-of-bounds reads in these handlers. Fix this by using skb_pull_data() to validate and access the required data before dereferencing it. rfcomm_recv_rpn() requires special handling since ETSI TS 07.10 allows 1-byte RPN requests. Handle this by validating only the DLCI byte first, and validating the full struct only when len > 1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Linux kernel's Bluetooth RFCOMM implementation has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in MCC (Multiplexer Control Command) handlers. These handlers cast skb->data to protocol-specific structs without validating skb->len first, allowing a malicious remote device to send truncated MCC frames and trigger out-of-bounds reads. The fix requires using skb_pull_data() to validate and access required data before dereferencing, with special handling for rfcomm_recv_rpn() since ETSI TS 07.10 allows 1-byte RPN requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.12.1, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 2.6.12= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine running kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the exact kernel version stringAffected if The kernel version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2.6.12.1 and < 5.15.210; >= 5.16 and < 6.1.176; >= 6.2 and < 6.6.143; >= 6.7 and < 6.12.94; >= 6.13 and < 6.18.36; >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13; equals 2.6.12; or equals 7.1
-
Verify if Bluetooth RFCOMM is enabledCheck if the rfcomm kernel module is loaded with `lsmod | grep rfcomm`, or check for RFCOMM device nodes with `ls -la /dev/rfcomm*`Affected if RFCOMM module is loaded or /dev/rfcomm* device nodes exist, meaning the Bluetooth RFCOMM stack is active and could receive malicious MCC frames
-
Check for active Bluetooth interfacesRun `hciconfig -a` or `bluetoothctl list` to enumerate configured Bluetooth adaptersAffected if Any Bluetooth adapter is configured and powered on, as remote attackers would need an active Bluetooth connection to send truncated MCC frames
If the kernel version is within the affected ranges AND Bluetooth RFCOMM is actively enabled with a configured adapter, the system is potentially vulnerable to out-of-bounds reads from malicious truncated MCC frames.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.2106.1.1766.6.143
Apply the kernel patch that implements skb_pull_data() validation in RFCOMM MCC handlers and update to a kernel version containing this fix.
Linux Kernel 5.15.210, 6.1.176, 6.6.143, or 6.12.94 (depending on which version branch you are on)
- Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which version range your current kernel falls into from the affected ranges: < 5.15.210, < 6.1.176, < 6.6.143, or < 6.12.94
- For kernels in the < 5.15.210 range, upgrade to kernel version 5.15.210 or later
- For kernels in the >= 5.16, < 6.1.176 range, upgrade to kernel version 6.1.176 or later
- For kernels in the >= 6.2, < 6.6.143 range, upgrade to kernel version 6.6.143 or later
- For kernels in the >= 6.7, < 6.12.94 range, upgrade to kernel version 6.12.94 or later
- Apply the upgrade via your distribution's package manager (e.g., `apt-get dist-upgrade`, `yum update`, or `dnf upgrade`)
- Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53254 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53254 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data