Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2026-53259

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.18.36 / 7.0.13 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click Patch available 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: anycast: insert aca into global hash under idev->lock syzbot reported a splat [1]: a slab-use-after-free in ipv6_chk_acast_addr(), which walks the global inet6_acaddr_lst[] hash under RCU and dereferences a struct ifacaddr6 that has already been freed while still linked in the hash, so a later reader walks into a dangling node. In __ipv6_dev_ac_inc() the aca is allocated with refcount 1, then aca_get() bumps it to 2 to keep it alive across the unlocked region. It is published to idev->ac_list under idev->lock, but ipv6_add_acaddr_hash() runs after write_unlock_bh(). A concurrent teardown (ipv6_ac_destroy_dev() from addrconf_ifdown(), under RTNL) can slip into that window: CPU0 __ipv6_dev_ac_inc CPU1 ipv6_ac_destroy_dev (RTNL) ------------------------------ ------------------------------------ aca_alloc() refcnt 1 aca_get() refcnt 2 write_lock_bh(idev->lock) add aca to ac_list write_unlock_bh(idev->lock) write_lock_bh(idev->lock) pull aca off ac_list write_unlock_bh(idev->lock) ipv6_del_acaddr_hash(aca) hlist_del_init_rcu() is a no-op, aca is not in the hash yet aca_put() refcnt 2->1 ipv6_add_acaddr_hash(aca) aca now inserted into the hash aca_put() refcnt 1->0 call_rcu(aca_free_rcu) -> kfree(aca) The hash removal becomes a no-op because the insertion has not happened yet, so once CPU0 inserts and drops the last reference, the aca is freed while still linked in inet6_acaddr_lst[], and readers dereference freed memory after the slab slot is reused. This window opened once RTNL stopped serializing the join path against device teardown. Move ipv6_add_acaddr_hash() inside the idev->lock section so the ac_list and hash insertions are atomic with respect to teardown: a racing remover now either misses the aca entirely or finds it in both lists. acaddr_hash_lock is now nested under idev->lock, which is acquired in softirq context, so switch all acaddr_hash_lock sites to spin_lock_bh() to avoid the irq lock inversion reported in [2]. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a01df04303c131efbf3a [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A race condition in Linux kernel's IPv6 anycast address handling causes a use-after-free. The aca structure is added to the device's ac_list under idev->lock, but inserted into the global hash AFTER releasing that lock. A concurrent device teardown can remove the aca from ac_list, drop its refcount to free it, and then the original code inserts the now-freed aca into the hash, leading to use-after-free when readers dereference it.

MitigationApply the kernel patch which moves ipv6_add_acaddr_hash() inside the idev->lock critical section and changes acaddr_hash_lock sites to spin_lock_bh() to ensure atomic insertion and prevent the race window.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 6.17, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check kernel version
    Run `uname -r` to get the running kernel version
    Affected if Version is >= 6.17 and < 6.18.36, OR >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, OR exactly 7.1
  2. Verify IPv6 anycast support is in use
    Check if any IPv6 anycast addresses are configured on the system using `ip -6 addr show` and look for `anycast` in the output
    Affected if Any IPv6 anycast addresses are assigned to network interfaces and the kernel version is in the affected range
  3. Confirm kernel build configuration
    Check that IPv6 support is enabled in the kernel config (CONFIG_IPV6=y or m) - this is typically found in /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz
    Affected if Kernel has IPv6 support compiled in and version is affected

The system is affected if running a kernel version in the specified ranges AND IPv6 anycast address functionality is in use, as the race condition only manifests when concurrently adding anycast addresses while a network device is being torn down.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.18.36 / 7.0.13 or later
Fixed in 6.18.367.0.13
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Interim mitigation

Apply the kernel patch which moves ipv6_add_acaddr_hash() inside the idev->lock critical section and changes acaddr_hash_lock sites to spin_lock_bh() to ensure atomic insertion and prevent the race window.

Recommended fix High confidence

Linux kernel >= 6.18.36, >= 7.0.13, or >= 7.2 (depending on which branch you're on)

  1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
  2. Check if the version is affected: >= 6.17 and < 6.18.36, OR >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, OR exactly 7.1
  3. For systems running 6.17.x through 6.18.x: upgrade to kernel version 6.18.36 or later
  4. For systems running 6.19.x: upgrade to kernel version 7.0.13 or later
  5. For systems running 7.1: upgrade to kernel version 7.2 or later
  6. After kernel upgrade, reboot to apply the fix
  7. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version after reboot
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require matching distribution-specific kernel packages; ensure proper backup and testing in non-production environments before deploying

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Linux Kernel Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53259 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53259 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data