CVE-2026-53337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: bonding: fix NULL pointer dereference in bond_do_ioctl() In bond_do_ioctl(), slave_dev is obtained via __dev_get_by_name() which can return NULL if the requested interface name does not exist. However, the subsequent slave_dbg() call is placed before the NULL check: slave_dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr->ifr_slave); slave_dbg(bond_dev, slave_dev, "slave_dev=%p:\n", slave_dev); //here if (!slave_dev) return -ENODEV; The slave_dbg() macro expands to netdev_dbg(bond_dev, "(slave %s): " fmt, (slave_dev)->name, ...) which unconditionally dereferences slave_dev->name before the NULL check is performed. This results in a NULL pointer dereference kernel oops when a user calls bonding ioctl (e.g. SIOCBONDENSLAVE, SIOCBONDRELEASE, etc.) with a non-existent slave interface name. This is reachable from userspace via the bonding ioctl interface with CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, making it a potential local denial-of-service vector. Fix by moving the slave_dbg() call after the NULL check.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's bond_do_ioctl() function where the slave_dbg() macro is called before validating that slave_dev is non-NULL. Since slave_dbg() expands to netdev_dbg which dereferences slave_dev->name, providing a non-existent interface name to bonding ioctls (SIOCBONDENSLAVE, SIOCBONDRELEASE, etc.) causes a kernel oops, resulting in local denial-of-service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.3, < 5.10.259>= 5.11, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel version against affected rangesRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the kernel version, then compare against: >= 5.3, < 5.10.259; >= 5.11, < 5.15.210; >= 5.16, < 6.1.176; >= 6.2, < 6.6.143; >= 6.7, < 6.12.94; >= 6.13, < 6.18.36; >= 6.19, < 7.0.13; = 7.1Affected if Kernel version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges
-
Verify if bonding module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep bonding' or check /sys/class/net for bond* interfacesAffected if Bonding module is loaded or any bond interfaces exist
-
Check for active bond interfaces with slavesRun 'ip link show' or 'cat /proc/net/bonding/bond*' to list configured bond interfaces and their slavesAffected if Any bond interface with slave interfaces is configured and active
Environment is affected if the kernel version is within the vulnerable ranges AND bonding with slave interfaces is in use, as the NULL pointer dereference occurs when bond_do_ioctl() processes ioctls referencing slave interfaces.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2595.15.2106.1.176
Apply the upstream fix by moving the slave_dbg() call after the NULL check, or backport the patch if running an older kernel version. Restrict CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to trusted users to reduce attack surface.
6.6.143 (or latest stable 6.6.x release)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Check if the current version is affected by comparing against the vulnerable ranges: >= 5.3 && < 5.10.259, >= 5.11 && < 5.15.210, >= 5.16 && < 6.1.176, or >= 6.2 && < 6.6.143
- If affected, upgrade the Linux kernel to a fixed release: 5.10.259 or later for the 5.10 branch, 5.15.210 or later for the 5.15 branch, 6.1.176 or later for the 6.1 branch, or 6.6.143 or later for the 6.6 branch
- For enterprise distributions, apply vendor-provided kernel updates which include this fix
- Reboot the system into the updated kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version and confirming the bonding ioctl no longer crashes on non-existent slave interface names
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data