CVE-2026-53339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: qcom-cci: Fix NULL pointer dereference in cci_remove() On all modern platforms Qualcomm CCI controller provides two I2C masters, and on particular boards only one I2C master may be initialized, and in such cases the device unbinding or driver removal causes a NULL pointer dereference, because cci_halt() is called for all two I2C masters, but a completion is initialized only for the single enabled master: % rmmod i2c-qcom-cci Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 <snip> Call trace: __wait_for_common+0x194/0x1a8 (P) wait_for_completion_timeout+0x20/0x2c cci_remove+0xc4/0x138 [i2c_qcom_cci] platform_remove+0x20/0x30 device_remove+0x4c/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c8/0x224 driver_detach+0x50/0x98 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20 qcom_cci_driver_exit+0x18/0x1008 [i2c_qcom_cci] ....
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the Qualcomm CCI (Camera Control Interface) I2C driver, cci_remove() attempts to halt both I2C masters regardless of whether they were initialized. On platforms where only one master is enabled, the completion structure for the second master remains uninitialized, causing a NULL pointer dereference when wait_for_completion_timeout() is called on it during driver removal.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.8, < 5.10.259>= 5.11, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the running kernel versionAffected if Kernel version falls within any of the affected ranges: >= 5.8 and < 5.10.259, >= 5.11 and < 5.15.210, >= 5.16 and < 6.1.176, >= 6.2 and < 6.6.143, >= 6.7 and < 6.12.94, >= 6.13 and < 6.18.36, >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, or exactly 7.1
-
Verify i2c-qcom-cci driver is presentCheck for the driver in /sys/bus/platform/drivers/i2c-qcom-cci or look for 'qcom,cci' in /proc/device-tree/ compatible stringsAffected if The i2c-qcom-cci driver is compiled into or loaded by the kernel on the system
-
Check CCI master configuration in device treeExamine the device tree source or /proc/device-tree for qcom,cci master nodes - look for 'qcom,cci-master' entries and whether both masters are defined as 'status = "okay"'Affected if Only ONE CCI master is enabled (status okay) while the other is disabled or not present, creating the condition where cci_remove() attempts to halt an uninitialized master
-
Confirm driver removal path will be triggeredCheck if the i2c-qcom-cci device is currently bound by examining /sys/bus/platform/drivers/i2c-qcom-cci/uevent or checking if the device appears in 'lsmod' or /sys/modulesAffected if The CCI driver is actively bound to a device and the system has performed or may perform a driver removal, unbinding, or module unload operation
You are affected if your kernel version is within the affected ranges AND your system uses the i2c-qcom-cci driver with only one CCI master enabled, as this creates the NULL completion structure condition when the driver is removed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2595.15.2106.1.176
Apply the upstream kernel fix which adds a check to verify each I2C master is initialized before calling cci_halt() on it during driver removal. This prevents dereferencing NULL completion structures for uninitialized masters.
5.10.259, 5.15.210, 6.1.176, or 6.6.143 (depending on which major version branch is in use)
- Identify the current kernel version using `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version`
- Determine which version branch your current kernel belongs to based on the affected ranges provided
- Upgrade the kernel to a fixed version: For 5.10.x branch, upgrade to 5.10.259 or later; For 5.15.x branch, upgrade to 5.15.210 or later; For 6.1.x branch, upgrade to 6.1.176 or later; For 6.2+ branches, upgrade to 6.6.143 or later
- Reboot the system into the new kernel to apply the fix
- Verify the fix by unloading and reloading the i2c-qcom-cci module (or rebooting) to confirm the NULL pointer dereference no longer occurs during driver removal
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data