CVE-2026-53349
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: destroy stale expectfn expectations on unregister NAT helpers such as nf_nat_h323 store a raw pointer to module text in exp->expectfn (e.g. ip_nat_q931_expect). nf_ct_helper_expectfn_unregister() only unlinks the callback descriptor and never walks the expectation table, so an expectation pending at module removal survives with a dangling exp->expectfn into freed module text. When the expected connection arrives, init_conntrack() invokes exp->expectfn(), now a stale pointer into the unloaded module. Reproduced on a KASAN build by loading the H.323 helpers, creating a Q.931 expectation, unloading nf_nat_h323, then connecting to the expected port: Oops: int3: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI RIP: 0010:0xffffffffa06102d1 init_conntrack.isra.0 (net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1862) nf_conntrack_in (net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2049) ipv4_conntrack_local (net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c:223) nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:619) __ip_local_out (net/ipv4/ip_output.c:120) __tcp_transmit_skb (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1715) tcp_connect (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4374) tcp_v4_connect (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:345) __sys_connect (net/socket.c:2167) Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_h323 [last unloaded: nf_nat_h323] Reaching the dangling state requires CAP_SYS_MODULE in the initial user namespace to remove a NAT helper that still has live expectations, so this is a robustness fix; leaving an expectation pointing at freed text is wrong regardless. Add nf_ct_helper_expectfn_destroy(), which walks the expectation table and drops every expectation whose ->expectfn matches the descriptor being torn down. Call it from each NAT helper's exit path after the existing RCU grace period, so no expectation outlives the code it points at and no extra synchronize_rcu() is introduced. With the fix, the same reproducer runs to completion without the Oops.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA dangling pointer vulnerability in Linux kernel's netfilter nf_conntrack module where NAT helpers (e.g., nf_nat_h323) store raw function pointers in exp->expectfn. When a helper is unloaded while expectations exist, the pointer becomes stale. Later, when init_conntrack() invokes the dangling exp->expectfn for a matching connection, it crashes executing freed module text.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.20, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel version against affected rangesRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the kernel version. Compare against: < 6.1.176, >= 6.2 and < 6.6.143, >= 6.7 and < 6.12.94, >= 6.13 and < 6.18.36, >= 6.19 and < 7.0.13, or 7.1Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the affected version ranges
-
Identify loaded NAT helper modulesRun 'lsmod | grep nf_nat' or check /proc/modules for modules like nf_nat_h323, nf_nat_ftp, nf_nat_sip, nf_nat_pptp, nf_nat_tftp or similar NAT helper modulesAffected if Any NAT helper modules (nf_nat_*) are currently loaded
-
List active conntrack expectationsRun 'conntrack -L expect' or 'conntrack -E expect' to list all active connection tracking expectations in the systemAffected if There are active expectations in the conntrack table, particularly those referencing NAT helpers
-
Check for recently unloaded NAT helper modulesReview system logs (dmesg, journalctl) for messages indicating NAT helper module unloading, or compare current loaded modules against known baselineAffected if A NAT helper module was unloaded while active expectations existed in the conntrack table
You are affected if your kernel version is within the affected ranges AND you have NAT helpers loaded with active conntrack expectations that may have persisted through a helper module unload event.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.1766.6.1436.12.94
Apply the kernel patch adding nf_ct_helper_expectfn_destroy() to clean up expectations before module removal. Until patched, avoid unloading NAT helpers (nf_nat_h323, etc.) while active expectations exist in the connection tracking table.
Linux kernel 6.1.176, 6.6.143, 6.12.94, or 6.18.36 (or later stable releases)
- Identify the current kernel version using `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version`
- Determine which major kernel series you are running (e.g., 6.1.x, 6.2.x, 6.7.x, 6.13.x)
- For kernels 2.6.20 through 6.1.x: upgrade to kernel version 6.1.176 or later
- For kernels 6.2.x: upgrade to kernel version 6.6.143 or later
- For kernels 6.7.x through 6.11.x: upgrade to kernel version 6.12.94 or later
- For kernels 6.13.x through 6.17.x: upgrade to kernel version 6.18.36 or later
- Alternatively, upgrade to the latest stable kernel available from your distribution (6.12+ or 6.18+ recommended)
- Reboot into the new kernel to apply the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,536.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53349 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53349 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data