CVE-2026-53354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: errata: Mitigate TLBI errata on various Arm CPUs A number of CPUs developed by Arm suffer from errata whereby a broadcast TLBI;DSB sequence may complete before the global observation of writes which are translated by an affected TLB entry. These errata ONLY affect the completion of memory accesses which have been translated by an invalidated TLB entry, and these errata DO NOT affect the actual invalidation of TLB entries. TLB entries are removed correctly. This issue has been assigned CVE ID CVE-2025-10263. To mitigate this issue, Arm recommends that software follows any affected TLBI;DSB sequence with an additional TLBI;DSB, which will ensure that all memory write effects affected by the first TLBI have been globally observed. The additional TLBI can use any operation that is broadcast to affected CPUs, and the additional DSB can use any option that is sufficient to complete the additional TLBI. The ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI workaround is sufficient to mitigate the issue. Enable this workaround for affected CPUs, and update the silicon errata documentation accordingly. Note that due to the manner in which Arm develops IP and tracks errata, some CPUs share a common erratum number.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a hardware erratum in Arm CPUs where a broadcast TLBI;DSB (TLB Invalidate;Data Synchronization Barrier) sequence may complete before writes translated by an invalidated TLB entry are globally observed, potentially causing memory coherence issues. The Linux kernel provides the ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI workaround that adds an extra TLBI;DSB pair to ensure proper memory ordering. The fix requires enabling this workaround for affected CPU variants in the kernel's errata handling code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.7, < 5.10.259>= 5.11, < 5.15.210>= 5.16, < 6.1.176>= 6.2, < 6.6.143>= 6.7, < 6.12.94>= 6.13, < 6.18.36>= 6.19, < 7.0.13>= 7.1, < 7.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Arm CPU modelRun 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Linux or check system firmware/dmesg for CPU part number or implementer details (e.g., ARM implementer ID and variant)Affected if CPU is an Arm processor whose model falls within the errata-affected range and lacks the fix
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the kernel version, then check if it includes the ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI fix (generally kernel 6.x and later may include it, but check release notes)Affected if Kernel version predates the errata fix being merged
-
Verify kernel config for workaroundCheck /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz for CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI or similar errata enablement optionAffected if The kernel configuration does not have the workaround enabled or compiled in
-
Confirm runtime errata statusCheck /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/flags or similar (on some distros) or review dmesg for 'TLBI' or 'errata' messages at boot; also check if 'cat /proc/sys/abi/vsyscall' reveals anything Arm-specific, though the primary check is dmesg for errata noticesAffected if Dmesg or system logs show the CPU is affected by the TLBI errata and no workaround is active
-
Verify memory ordering behaviorFor deep inspection, run memory barrier stress tests or latency benchmarks that exercise TLBI;DSB sequences; if tests show unexpected memory ordering, the system may be affectedAffected if Tests reveal stale data reads or memory ordering anomalies consistent with the described errata
The system is affected if it uses an Arm CPU impacted by this errata AND the running kernel does not have the ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI workaround enabled or compiled in.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.10.2595.15.2106.1.176
Enable the ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI kernel workaround for affected Arm CPU models by updating the CPU errata detection logic in the Linux kernel, along with updating associated silicon errata documentation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data